On Fri, 2025-07-04 at 09:29 -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
> Hi Tvrtko,
>
> On 23/06/25 09:27, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > Currently the job free work item will lock sched->job_list_lock
> > first time
> > to see if there are any jobs, free a single job, and then lock
> > again to
> > decide whether to re-queue itself if there are more finished jobs.
> >
> > Since drm_sched_get_finished_job() already looks at the second job
> > in the
> > queue we can simply add the signaled check and have it return the
> > presence
> > of more jobs to free to the caller. That way the work item does not
> > have
> > to lock the list again and repeat the signaled check.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursu...@igalia.com>
> > Cc: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
> > Cc: Danilo Krummrich <d...@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.br...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Philipp Stanner <pha...@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 39 +++++++++++----------
> > -----
> > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > index 1f077782ec12..c6c26aec07b6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> > @@ -366,22 +366,6 @@ static void __drm_sched_run_free_queue(struct
> > drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> > queue_work(sched->submit_wq, &sched-
> > >work_free_job);
> > }
> >
> > -/**
> > - * drm_sched_run_free_queue - enqueue free-job work if ready
> > - * @sched: scheduler instance
> > - */
> > -static void drm_sched_run_free_queue(struct drm_gpu_scheduler
> > *sched)
> > -{
> > - struct drm_sched_job *job;
> > -
> > - spin_lock(&sched->job_list_lock);
> > - job = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched->pending_list,
> > - struct drm_sched_job,
> > list);
> > - if (job && dma_fence_is_signaled(&job->s_fence->finished))
> > - __drm_sched_run_free_queue(sched);
> > - spin_unlock(&sched->job_list_lock);
> > -}
> > -
> > /**
> > * drm_sched_job_done - complete a job
> > * @s_job: pointer to the job which is done
> > @@ -1102,12 +1086,13 @@ drm_sched_select_entity(struct
> > drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> > * drm_sched_get_finished_job - fetch the next finished job to be
> > destroyed
> > *
> > * @sched: scheduler instance
> > + * @have_more: are there more finished jobs on the list
> > *
> > * Returns the next finished job from the pending list (if there
> > is one)
> > * ready for it to be destroyed.
> > */
> > static struct drm_sched_job *
> > -drm_sched_get_finished_job(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> > +drm_sched_get_finished_job(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched, bool
> > *have_more)
> > {
> > struct drm_sched_job *job, *next;
> >
> > @@ -1115,22 +1100,27 @@ drm_sched_get_finished_job(struct
> > drm_gpu_scheduler *sched)
> >
> > job = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched->pending_list,
> > struct drm_sched_job,
> > list);
> > -
> > if (job && dma_fence_is_signaled(&job->s_fence->finished))
> > {
> > /* remove job from pending_list */
> > list_del_init(&job->list);
> >
> > /* cancel this job's TO timer */
> > cancel_delayed_work(&sched->work_tdr);
> > - /* make the scheduled timestamp more accurate */
> > +
> > + *have_more = false;
> > next = list_first_entry_or_null(&sched-
> > >pending_list,
> > typeof(*next),
> > list);
> > -
> > if (next) {
> > + /* make the scheduled timestamp more
> > accurate */
> > if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_TIMESTAMP_BIT,
> > &next->s_fence-
> > >scheduled.flags))
> > next->s_fence->scheduled.timestamp
> > =
> > dma_fence_timestamp(&job-
> > >s_fence->finished);
> > +
> > + if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_SIGNALED_BIT,
> > + &next->s_fence-
> > >finished.flags))
>
> Shouldn't we use dma_fence_is_signaled() to keep the same check that
> we
> have in drm_sched_run_free_queue()?
There is a paused-ongoing discussion about this function:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250522112540.161411-2-pha...@kernel.org/
dma_fence_is_signaled() can have side effects by actually signaling,
instead of just checking.
Not sure if Tvrtko wanted to bypass that behavior here, though.
P.
>
> Best Regards,
> - Maíra
>
> > + *have_more = true;
> > +
> > /* start TO timer for next job */
> > drm_sched_start_timeout(sched);
> > }
>
>
