On 11.08.2025 10:48, Christian König wrote: ...snip... > > Looks valid to me. Potentially just copy&pasted from some older HW generation > and not correctly adjusted for r600. > > But the HW handled here is >15 years and the code easily >10 years old. I'm > really wondering why gcc only complains now? > > Regards, > Christian. > > > > > Would really appreciate some feedback. > > (CC-ed Dave) > > > That option -Werror=unused-but-set-variable= is new in GCC 16, maybe that's why it was never caught before?
Would you like me to send a patch? -- Regards, listout
