I already pushed Rb'ed commits that patch them up :-)
The commits add functionality but they were written before Rex had
ported smumgr stuff up into hwmgr and when they were merged nobody
compile tested them.
So reverting is probably not the best idea.
On 02/10/17 10:47 AM, Harry Wentland wrote:
Does anyone have a strong opinion for or against reverting the offending
commits?
Harry
On 2017-10-02 09:49 AM, Tom St Denis wrote:
The lastest good commit is
commit f5a16c561fb8a15e94a4384e880b9d84a2657098
Author: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
Date: Thu Sep 28 14:46:17 2017 +0100
drm/radeon: make functions alloc_pasid and free_pasid static
The functions alloc_pasid and free_pasid are local to the
source and do not need to be in global scope, so make them static.
Cleans up sparse warnings:
warning: symbol 'alloc_pasid' was not declared. Should it be static?
warning: symbol 'free_pasid' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
I see errors (e.g., attached) when building from the tip of drm-next.
Cheers,
Tom
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
