On 10/30/2025 10:14 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
Patches 2-4 are:
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>
Thanks!
How about patch 1? Patch 4 builds on it, so if that doesn't go in there
is another unwind step needed.
On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 12:36 AM Mario Limonciello (AMD)
<[email protected]> wrote:
If any hardware IPs involved with the first phase of suspend fail, unwind
all steps to restore back to original state.
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
index f6850b86e96f..b9ea91b2c92f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
@@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ struct amdgpu_init_level amdgpu_init_minimal_xgmi = {
BIT(AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_COMMON) | BIT(AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_IH) |
BIT(AMD_IP_BLOCK_TYPE_PSP)
};
+static int amdgpu_device_ip_resume_phase3(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
static void amdgpu_device_load_switch_state(struct amdgpu_device *adev);
@@ -3784,7 +3785,7 @@ static void amdgpu_device_delay_enable_gfx_off(struct
work_struct *work)
*/
static int amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase1(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
{
- int i, r;
+ int i, r, rec;
amdgpu_device_set_pg_state(adev, AMD_PG_STATE_UNGATE);
amdgpu_device_set_cg_state(adev, AMD_CG_STATE_UNGATE);
@@ -3807,10 +3808,23 @@ static int amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase1(struct
amdgpu_device *adev)
r = amdgpu_ip_block_suspend(&adev->ip_blocks[i]);
if (r)
- return r;
+ goto unwind;
}
return 0;
+unwind:
+ rec = amdgpu_device_ip_resume_phase3(adev);
+ if (rec)
+ dev_err(adev->dev,
+ "amdgpu_device_ip_resume_phase3 failed during unwind:
%d\n",
+ rec);
+
+ amdgpu_dpm_set_df_cstate(adev, DF_CSTATE_ALLOW);
+
+ amdgpu_device_set_pg_state(adev, AMD_PG_STATE_GATE);
+ amdgpu_device_set_cg_state(adev, AMD_CG_STATE_GATE);
+
+ return r;
}
/**
--
2.51.1