On Fri, 2 Jan 2026, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:

> +cc literally everyone you should have cc'd in mm :/
> 
> Hi Mikulas,
> 
> You really need to check MAINTAINERS, you've sent a patch that changes 
> mm/vma.c
> without cc'ing a single maintainer or reviewer of that file. I just happened 
> to
> notice this by chance, even lei seemed to mess up the file query for some
> reason.

I saw

MEMORY MANAGEMENT
M:      Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
L:      [email protected]
S:      Maintained

in the MAINTAINERS file, so I sent the patch to Andrew and to 
[email protected]. I should have sent it also to people on the "MEMORY 
MANAGEMENT - CORE" section, but I missed it.

> I'm confused in general about this patch, you sent it on 7th Nov? And it's 
> been
> ignored until now and then taken without review to the hotfixes queue?

I'm developing code that translates parallelizable loops written in the 
Ajla programming language (www.ajla-lang.cz) into OpenCL and runs them on 
the graphics card. Ajla sets up a periodic timer that sends a signal for 
scheduling purposes and this signal interferes with OpenCL, causing the 
-EINTR failures.

So far, I worked around this bug by blocking all signals around the 
functions clGetPlatformIDs and clGetDeviceIDs - but it would be better to 
fix it in the Linux kernel and remove the signal-blocking hacks.

Mikulas

Reply via email to