On 1/5/26 13:18, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2026 at 10:15:36PM +0100, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
Provide a dummy function fatal_signal_pending, because it will be used in
the following patch in the function mm_take_all_locks.
This commit avoids a test failure when the following patch will be apllied.
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
No, please don't cc stable. Also don't cc stable without a Fixes tag.
This isn't backportable given you now need to backport to 5.10, 5.15, 6.1, 6.6,
6.12, 6.17.
I'm not sure how Andrew deals with a mix of Cc: stable and not-cc-stable patches
in a series, think he generally doesn't like, but I'm not sure how exactly we
are supposed to express order here otherwise. Andrew?
Can't we just have this hunk here as part of patch #2?
Backporting should be rather simple, just drop the hunk on kernels where
it doesn't apply. Sure, a bit of manual work, but better than making our
life more complicated here.
But maybe I am missing something.
--
Cheers
David
