On Wed, 2026-01-28 at 11:07 +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > ** NOTE: > First three patches have been already reviewed and are conceptualy > independent. But as the code conflicts, I am including them while waiting > for > them to be merged via amd-next, and until they percolate back to drm-tip, > in > order to avoid having to maintain two separate patch series.
So your intention with this v6 is just to get more reviews? What is the purpose? And since the plan is supposedly that the drm_sched maintainers take it, when will they know that it's ready now? Can we agree on delaying a v7 until all lights are green? For the future, I think the more canonical (and less confusing) way to handle situations like this is not to include foreign patches into a single-topic patch series, but to hint in the cover letter at the situation and provide links: "Series is blocked by [1], [2]". P.
