Using a ',' in place of a ';' can have unintended side effects. Although that is not the case here, it seems best to use ';' unless ',' is intended.
Found by inspection. No functional change intended. Compile tested only. Signed-off-by: Chen Ni <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c index 781896c9fd26..6daec964ca5e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_userq_fence.c @@ -961,13 +961,13 @@ int amdgpu_userq_wait_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, } num_read_bo_handles = wait_info->num_bo_read_handles; - ptr = u64_to_user_ptr(wait_info->bo_read_handles), + ptr = u64_to_user_ptr(wait_info->bo_read_handles); r = drm_gem_objects_lookup(filp, ptr, num_read_bo_handles, &gobj_read); if (r) goto free_timeline_points; num_write_bo_handles = wait_info->num_bo_write_handles; - ptr = u64_to_user_ptr(wait_info->bo_write_handles), + ptr = u64_to_user_ptr(wait_info->bo_write_handles); r = drm_gem_objects_lookup(filp, ptr, num_write_bo_handles, &gobj_write); if (r) -- 2.25.1
