On Fri, Mar 20, 2026 at 10:42 AM Louis Chauvet <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Mar 2026 07:19:56 -0600, Jim Cromie <[email protected]> wrote: > > [...] > > cases; perhaps a 3-X-3 of classmap-defns X classmap-users would get > > too awkward and fiddly. > > > > This is an untested interface extension, so drop this patch if it > > feels too speculative, knowing theres at least a notional solution > > should the situation arise. > > I agree on the patch principle, the implementation seems good. > > Can you move this patch after the BROKEN removal? I think you should > "stabilize" core features first so we can merge part of the series (and > reduce patch count). >
I'll do this. > > > > > > diff --git a/lib/dynamic_debug.c b/lib/dynamic_debug.c > > index e9fa0c8868db..2083a8546460 100644 > > --- a/lib/dynamic_debug.c > > +++ b/lib/dynamic_debug.c > > @@ -206,12 +206,17 @@ ddebug_find_valid_class(struct _ddebug_info const > > *di, const char *query_class, > > return NULL; > > } > > > > -static bool ddebug_class_in_range(const int class_id, const struct > > _ddebug_class_map *map) > > +static bool ddebug_class_map_in_range(const int class_id, const struct > > _ddebug_class_map *map) > > (that the rename I mentionned earlier) I dont know what you mean here. > > -- > Louis Chauvet <[email protected]>
