Public > From: Koenig, Christian <[email protected]> > > That's a clear NAK. > > This just works around the problem in an incorrect way. The real question is > why we have the get in late_init()?
This was my first reaction too, but the fix I came up with is quite a bit more involved, I've sent it in a followup in https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/167423/. This would be a quick fix that's much easier to backport. Teddy
