On 6/19/26 20:45, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> These adapters typically are only supported by Barco on the Windows
> platform. However, with these changes in the linux driver, multiple
> monitor support should work correctly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Jacob <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
> index 60debd543e44..e3ba168795cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
> @@ -1926,6 +1926,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id pciidlist[] = {
> {0x1002, 0x6646, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0,
> CHIP_BONAIRE|AMD_IS_MOBILITY},
> {0x1002, 0x6647, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0,
> CHIP_BONAIRE|AMD_IS_MOBILITY},
> {0x1002, 0x6649, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_BONAIRE},
> + {0x1002, 0x664D, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_BONAIRE}, //
> Barco MXRT-5600
Please no // style comments in kernel code.
Apart from that looks good to me, but I'm wondering if we shouldn't print a
warning or similar.
It could be that those boards have non standard VBIOS changes and cause
problems on Linux.
Regards,
Christian.
> {0x1002, 0x6650, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_BONAIRE},
> {0x1002, 0x6651, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_BONAIRE},
> {0x1002, 0x6658, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_BONAIRE},
> @@ -1995,6 +1996,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id pciidlist[] = {
> {0x1002, 0x6930, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_TONGA},
> {0x1002, 0x6938, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_TONGA},
> {0x1002, 0x6939, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_TONGA},
> + {0x1002, 0x693B, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_TONGA}, // Barco
> MXRT-7600
> /* fiji */
> {0x1002, 0x7300, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_FIJI},
> {0x1002, 0x730F, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_FIJI},
> @@ -2023,6 +2025,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id pciidlist[] = {
> {0x1002, 0x67C4, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_POLARIS10},
> {0x1002, 0x67C7, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_POLARIS10},
> {0x1002, 0x67D0, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_POLARIS10},
> + {0x1002, 0x67D4, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_POLARIS10}, //
> Tentative Barco MXRT-8750
> {0x1002, 0x67DF, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_POLARIS10},
> {0x1002, 0x67C8, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_POLARIS10},
> {0x1002, 0x67C9, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_POLARIS10},
> @@ -2036,6 +2039,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id pciidlist[] = {
> {0x1002, 0x6985, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_POLARIS12},
> {0x1002, 0x6986, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_POLARIS12},
> {0x1002, 0x6987, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_POLARIS12},
> + {0x1002, 0x698F, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_POLARIS12}, //
> Tentative Barco MXRT-4700
> {0x1002, 0x6995, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_POLARIS12},
> {0x1002, 0x6997, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_POLARIS12},
> {0x1002, 0x699F, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, CHIP_POLARIS12},
> --
> 2.47.3
>
