Hi,

On Fri, 2026-07-03 at 18:31 +0200, Natalie Vock wrote:
> From: Christian König <[email protected]>
> 
> It's just another layer of indirection.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Natalie Vock <[email protected]>

Personally I don't have a strong opinion on this, but the reason for
separating out the ops is that adding function pointers in the walk
iterator itself was once pushed back on quite forcefully by Linus when
I tried to do that in mm/pagewalk. Claiming for various reasons the
standard way of doing that in Linux is using a const ops struct that
ends up in unmodifiable memory.

/Thomas


> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c      | 12 ++----------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c |  2 +-
>  include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h          | 34 ++++++++++++++---------------
> -----
>  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> index 2b470c1746f60..1fb8c53da0362 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> @@ -545,10 +545,6 @@ static s64 ttm_bo_evict_cb(struct ttm_lru_walk
> *walk, struct ttm_buffer_object *
>       return lret;
>  }
>  
> -static const struct ttm_lru_walk_ops ttm_evict_walk_ops = {
> -     .process_bo = ttm_bo_evict_cb,
> -};
> -
>  static int ttm_bo_evict_alloc(struct ttm_device *bdev,
>                             struct ttm_resource_manager *man,
>                             const struct ttm_place *place,
> @@ -560,7 +556,7 @@ static int ttm_bo_evict_alloc(struct ttm_device
> *bdev,
>  {
>       struct ttm_bo_evict_walk evict_walk = {
>               .walk = {
> -                     .ops = &ttm_evict_walk_ops,
> +                     .process_bo = ttm_bo_evict_cb,
>                       .arg = {
>                               .ctx = ctx,
>                               .ticket = ticket,
> @@ -1187,10 +1183,6 @@ ttm_bo_swapout_cb(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk,
> struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
>       return ret;
>  }
>  
> -const struct ttm_lru_walk_ops ttm_swap_ops = {
> -     .process_bo = ttm_bo_swapout_cb,
> -};
> -
>  /**
>   * ttm_bo_swapout() - Swap out buffer objects on the LRU list to
> shmem.
>   * @bdev: The ttm device.
> @@ -1209,7 +1201,7 @@ s64 ttm_bo_swapout(struct ttm_device *bdev,
> struct ttm_operation_ctx *ctx,
>  {
>       struct ttm_bo_swapout_walk swapout_walk = {
>               .walk = {
> -                     .ops = &ttm_swap_ops,
> +                     .process_bo = ttm_bo_swapout_cb,
>                       .arg = {
>                               .ctx = ctx,
>                               .trylock_only = true,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
> index 7ed085adf1c9b..29f068944a972 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_util.c
> @@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ s64 ttm_lru_walk_for_evict(struct ttm_lru_walk
> *walk, struct ttm_device *bdev,
>       s64 lret;
>  
>       ttm_bo_lru_for_each_reserved_guarded(&cursor, man, &walk-
> >arg, bo) {
> -             lret = walk->ops->process_bo(walk, bo);
> +             lret = walk->process_bo(walk, bo);
>               if (lret == -EBUSY || lret == -EALREADY)
>                       lret = 0;
>               progress = (lret < 0) ? lret : progress + lret;
> diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
> index 1eae9eea5ff32..0fcd5082a7080 100644
> --- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
> +++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.h
> @@ -189,24 +189,6 @@ struct ttm_operation_ctx {
>       uint64_t bytes_moved;
>  };
>  
> -struct ttm_lru_walk;
> -
> -/** struct ttm_lru_walk_ops - Operations for a LRU walk. */
> -struct ttm_lru_walk_ops {
> -     /**
> -      * process_bo - Process this bo.
> -      * @walk: struct ttm_lru_walk describing the walk.
> -      * @bo: A locked and referenced buffer object.
> -      *
> -      * Return: Negative error code on error, User-defined
> positive value
> -      * (typically, but not always, size of the processed bo) on
> success.
> -      * On success, the returned values are summed by the walk
> and the
> -      * walk exits when its target is met.
> -      * 0 also indicates success, -EBUSY means this bo was
> skipped.
> -      */
> -     s64 (*process_bo)(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk, struct
> ttm_buffer_object *bo);
> -};
> -
>  /**
>   * struct ttm_lru_walk_arg - Common part for the variants of BO LRU
> walk.
>   */
> @@ -223,8 +205,20 @@ struct ttm_lru_walk_arg {
>   * struct ttm_lru_walk - Structure describing a LRU walk.
>   */
>  struct ttm_lru_walk {
> -     /** @ops: Pointer to the ops structure. */
> -     const struct ttm_lru_walk_ops *ops;
> +     /**
> +      * process_bo - Process this bo.
> +      * @walk: struct ttm_lru_walk describing the walk.
> +      * @bo: A locked and referenced buffer object.
> +      *
> +      * Return: Negative error code on error, User-defined
> positive value
> +      * (typically, but not always, size of the processed bo) on
> success.
> +      * On success, the returned values are summed by the walk
> and the
> +      * walk exits when its target is met.
> +      * 0 also indicates success, -EBUSY means this bo was
> skipped.
> +      */
> +     s64 (*process_bo)(struct ttm_lru_walk *walk,
> +                       struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
> +
>       /** @arg: Common bo LRU walk arguments. */
>       struct ttm_lru_walk_arg arg;
>  };

Reply via email to