On 24/09/2026 22:10, Melissa Wen wrote:
Userspace trace tools that use libtraceevent to read binary buffer only
see a kernel address when printing const char *. Use string macros in
dcn_fpu to copy the function name into the trace event.

Fixes: 96ee63730fa3 ("drm/amd/display: Add control mechanism for FPU")
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-5-5
Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_trace.h | 6 +++---
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_trace.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_trace.h
index 7de4fe355c5d..b2f38654e489 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_trace.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_trace.h
@@ -637,20 +637,20 @@ TRACE_EVENT(dcn_fpu,
TP_STRUCT__entry(
                             __field(bool, begin)
-                            __field(const char *, function)
+                            __string(function, function)
                             __field(int, line)
                             __field(int, recursion_depth)
            ),
            TP_fast_assign(
                           __entry->begin = begin;
-                          __entry->function = function;
+                          __assign_str(function);
                           __entry->line = line;
                           __entry->recursion_depth = recursion_depth;
            ),
            TP_printk("%s: recursion_depth: %d: %s()+%d:",
                      __entry->begin ? "begin" : "end",
                      __entry->recursion_depth,
-                     __entry->function,
+                     __get_str(function),
                      __entry->line
            )
  );

The approach taken by TRACE_DCN_FPU is a bit over the top. Macro calling a function, calling a macro, calling a function.

Tracepoints are supposed to be ABI (said Linus, for better or worse) and tying kernel function names to ABI is a bad idea. Even line numbers. All very questionable IMO.

But as your patch fixes an obvious fail:

Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>

Regards,

Tvrtko



Reply via email to