Would this fix the regression I found on Carrizo after the drm-next rebase?
Tom On December 13, 2017 5:34:34 PM EST, Harry Wentland <[email protected]> wrote: >Signed-off-by: Harry Wentland <[email protected]> >Reviewed-by: Jordan Lazare <[email protected]> >Reviewed-by: Tony Cheng <[email protected]> >Acked-by: Harry Wentland <[email protected]> >--- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce110/dce110_hw_sequencer.c | 3 --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/hw_sequencer.h | 4 ---- > 2 files changed, 7 deletions(-) > >diff --git >a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce110/dce110_hw_sequencer.c >b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce110/dce110_hw_sequencer.c >index 80d36610c302..f0002d63eb63 100644 >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce110/dce110_hw_sequencer.c >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce110/dce110_hw_sequencer.c >@@ -2053,9 +2053,6 @@ enum dc_status dce110_apply_ctx_to_hw( > context, > dc); > >- if (dc->hwss.enable_plane) >- dc->hwss.enable_plane(dc, pipe_ctx, context); >- > if (DC_OK != status) > return status; > } >diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/hw_sequencer.h >b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/hw_sequencer.h >index b6215ba514d8..5d2b05b93e76 100644 >--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/hw_sequencer.h >+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/inc/hw_sequencer.h >@@ -138,10 +138,6 @@ struct hw_sequencer_funcs { > > void (*disable_plane)(struct dc *dc, struct pipe_ctx *pipe_ctx); > >- void (*enable_plane)(struct dc *dc, >- struct pipe_ctx *pipe, >- struct dc_state *context); >- > void (*update_info_frame)(struct pipe_ctx *pipe_ctx); > > void (*enable_stream)(struct pipe_ctx *pipe_ctx); >-- >2.14.1 > >_______________________________________________ >amd-gfx mailing list >[email protected] >https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
