On 2018-07-19 05:39 PM, Michel Dänzer wrote: > From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com> > > The warning turned out to be not so useful, as BO destruction tends to > be deferred to a workqueue. > > Also, we should be preventing any damage from this now, so not really > important anymore to fix code doing this. > > Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c > index b12526ce1a9d..3010f0136de9 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c > @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ static void amdgpu_ttm_bo_destroy(struct ttm_buffer_object > *tbo) > struct amdgpu_device *adev = amdgpu_ttm_adev(tbo->bdev); > struct amdgpu_bo *bo = ttm_to_amdgpu_bo(tbo); > > - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(bo->pin_count > 0)) > + if (bo->pin_count > 0) > amdgpu_bo_subtract_pin_size(bo); > > if (bo->kfd_bo) >
Any feedback? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
