Patches #1-#4 are Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>

I would squash patches #5-#8 into one and make sure that the patch is a clean replacement of the existing functionality with the new one.

For example patch #5 still has some code move for the stub fence which now seems unnecessary.

Regards,
Christian.

Am 24.08.2018 um 14:12 schrieb Chunming Zhou:
That is certainly totally nonsense. dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling()
is the function who is calling this callback.

Signed-off-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.z...@amd.com>
Cc: Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <dan...@ffwll.ch>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c | 1 -
  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
index 3a8837c49639..d17ed75ac7e2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_syncobj.c
@@ -184,7 +184,6 @@ static const char *drm_syncobj_null_fence_get_name(struct 
dma_fence *fence)
static bool drm_syncobj_null_fence_enable_signaling(struct dma_fence *fence)
  {
-    dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(fence);
      return !dma_fence_is_signaled(fence);
  }

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to