Hey Chunming,
On 20.09.2018 13:03, Chunming Zhou wrote:
@@ -1113,48 +1117,91 @@ static int amdgpu_syncobj_lookup_and_add_to_sync(struct
amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
}
static int amdgpu_cs_process_syncobj_in_dep(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
- struct amdgpu_cs_chunk *chunk)
+ struct amdgpu_cs_chunk *chunk,
+ bool timeline)
{
unsigned num_deps;
int i, r;
- struct drm_amdgpu_cs_chunk_sem *deps;
- deps = (struct drm_amdgpu_cs_chunk_sem *)chunk->kdata;
- num_deps = chunk->length_dw * 4 /
- sizeof(struct drm_amdgpu_cs_chunk_sem);
+ if (!timeline) {
+ struct drm_amdgpu_cs_chunk_sem *deps;
- for (i = 0; i < num_deps; ++i) {
- r = amdgpu_syncobj_lookup_and_add_to_sync(p, deps[i].handle);
+ deps = (struct drm_amdgpu_cs_chunk_sem *)chunk->kdata;
+ num_deps = chunk->length_dw * 4 /
+ sizeof(struct drm_amdgpu_cs_chunk_sem);
+ for (i = 0; i < num_deps; ++i) {
+ r = amdgpu_syncobj_lookup_and_add_to_sync(p,
deps[i].handle,
+ 0, 0);
if (r)
return r;
The indentation looks wrong.
+ }
+ } else {
+ struct drm_amdgpu_cs_chunk_syncobj *syncobj_deps;
+
+ syncobj_deps = (struct drm_amdgpu_cs_chunk_syncobj
*)chunk->kdata;
+ num_deps = chunk->length_dw * 4 /
+ sizeof(struct drm_amdgpu_cs_chunk_syncobj);
+ for (i = 0; i < num_deps; ++i) {
+ r = amdgpu_syncobj_lookup_and_add_to_sync(p,
syncobj_deps[i].handle,
+
syncobj_deps[i].point,
+
syncobj_deps[i].flags);
+ if (r)
+ return r;
Here as well.
So I'm wondering a bit about this uapi. Specifically, what happens if
you try to use timeline syncobjs here as dependencies _without_
DRM_SYNCOBJ_WAIT_FLAGS_WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT?
My understanding is, it'll just return -EINVAL without any indication as
to which syncobj actually failed. What's the caller supposed to do then?
Cheers,
Nicolai
--
Lerne, wie die Welt wirklich ist,
Aber vergiss niemals, wie sie sein sollte.
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
