From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com>

It indicates a pin/unpin imbalance bug somewhere. While the bug isn't
necessarily in the call chain hitting this, it's at least one part
involved.

Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daen...@amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
index fd271f9746a2..728e15e5d68a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c
@@ -912,7 +912,7 @@ int amdgpu_bo_unpin(struct amdgpu_bo *bo)
        struct ttm_operation_ctx ctx = { false, false };
        int r, i;
 
-       if (!bo->pin_count) {
+       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!bo->pin_count)) {
                dev_warn(adev->dev, "%p unpin not necessary\n", bo);
                return 0;
        }
-- 
2.20.0.rc2

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to