On Tue, Jan 08, 2019 at 07:35:16PM -0500, Lyude Paul wrote:
> It occurred to me that we never actually check this! So let's start
> doing that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <ly...@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: David Airlie <airl...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jerry Zuo <jerry....@amd.com>
> Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentl...@amd.com>
> Cc: Juston Li <juston...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> index fc778c6d487e..41cf814207bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> @@ -3650,7 +3650,7 @@ drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_topology_state(struct
> drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state
> *mst_state)
> {
> struct drm_dp_vcpi_allocation *vcpi;
> - int avail_slots = 63;
> + int avail_slots = 63, payload_count = 0;
>
> list_for_each_entry(vcpi, &mst_state->vcpis, next) {
> /* Releasing VCPI is always OK-even if the port is gone */
> @@ -3670,6 +3670,12 @@ drm_dp_mst_atomic_check_topology_state(struct
> drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> avail_slots + vcpi->vcpi);
> return -ENOSPC;
> }
> +
> + if (++payload_count > mgr->max_payloads) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MST MGR:%p] state %p has too many
> payloads (max=%d)\n",
> + mgr, mst_state, mgr->max_payloads);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> }
> DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("[MST MGR:%p] mst state %p VCPI avail=%d used=%d\n",
> mgr, mst_state, avail_slots,
> --
> 2.20.1
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
