On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 10:55:37AM +0800, Prike Liang wrote:
> This fix will handle some MP1 FW issue like as mclk dpm table in
> renoir has a reverse dpm clock layout and a zero frequency dpm level
> as following case.
>
> cat pp_dpm_mclk
> 0: 1200Mhz
> 1: 1200Mhz
> 2: 800Mhz
> 3: 0Mhz
>
> Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/smu_v12_0.c | 3 ---
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c
> index e3398f9..d454493 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/powerplay/amdgpu_smu.c
> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ int smu_set_soft_freq_range(struct smu_context *smu, enum
> smu_clk_type clk_type,
> {
> int ret = 0;
>
> - if (min <= 0 && max <= 0)
> + if (min < 0 && max < 0)
This change causes the following Coverity warning because min and max
are both unsigned:
int smu_set_soft_freq_range(struct smu_context *smu, enum smu_clk_type clk_type,
uint32_t min, uint32_t max)
>>> CID 1460516: Integer handling issues (NO_EFFECT)
>>> This less-than-zero comparison of an unsigned value is never true. "min
>>> < 0U".
225 if (min < 0 && max < 0)
226 return -EINVAL;
> return -EINVAL;
>
> if (!smu_clk_dpm_is_enabled(smu, clk_type))
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
