There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
should always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older
style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].

Refactor the code according to the use of a flexible-array member in
struct phm_cac_leakage_table, instead of a one-element array,
and use the struct_size() helper to calculate the size for the allocation.

Also, save some heap space as the original code is multiplying
table->ucNumEntries by sizeof(struct phm_cac_leakage_table) when it
should have been multiplied it by sizeof(struct phm_cac_leakage_record)
instead.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] 
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.9-rc1/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays

Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/5f7c5d38.it%2fqtjn+659xudo5%25...@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo...@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/hwmgr.h                  |  2 +-
 .../drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/processpptables.c    | 13 +++++--------
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/hwmgr.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/hwmgr.h
index b8e33325fac6..7e0c948a7097 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/hwmgr.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/inc/hwmgr.h
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ union phm_cac_leakage_record {
 
 struct phm_cac_leakage_table {
        uint32_t count;
-       union phm_cac_leakage_record entries[1];
+       union phm_cac_leakage_record entries[];
 };
 
 struct phm_samu_clock_voltage_dependency_record {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/processpptables.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/processpptables.c
index 7719f52e6d52..e059802d1e25 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/processpptables.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/hwmgr/processpptables.c
@@ -1384,17 +1384,14 @@ static int get_cac_leakage_table(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr,
                                const ATOM_PPLIB_CAC_Leakage_Table *table)
 {
        struct phm_cac_leakage_table  *cac_leakage_table;
-       unsigned long            table_size, i;
+       unsigned long i;
 
-       if (hwmgr == NULL || table == NULL || ptable == NULL)
+       if (!hwmgr || !table || !ptable)
                return -EINVAL;
 
-       table_size = sizeof(ULONG) +
-               (sizeof(struct phm_cac_leakage_table) * table->ucNumEntries);
-
-       cac_leakage_table = kzalloc(table_size, GFP_KERNEL);
-
-       if (cac_leakage_table == NULL)
+       cac_leakage_table = kzalloc(struct_size(cac_leakage_table, entries, 
table->ucNumEntries),
+                                   GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!cac_leakage_table)
                return -ENOMEM;
 
        cac_leakage_table->count = (ULONG)table->ucNumEntries;
-- 
2.27.0

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to