On Tue, Nov 03, 2020 at 02:50:40PM +0000, Deucher, Alexander wrote: > [AMD Public Use] > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Greg KH <[email protected]> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 1:53 AM > > To: Koenig, Christian <[email protected]> > > Cc: Alex Deucher <[email protected]>; Deepak R Varma > > <[email protected]>; David Airlie <[email protected]>; LKML <linux- > > [email protected]>; Maling list - DRI developers <dri- > > [email protected]>; Melissa Wen <[email protected]>; > > amd-gfx list <[email protected]>; Daniel Vetter > > <[email protected]>; Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>; Deucher, > > Alexander <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: do not initialise global variables to 0 or > > NULL > > > > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 09:06:21PM +0100, Christian König wrote: > > > Am 02.11.20 um 20:43 schrieb Alex Deucher: > > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 1:42 PM Deepak R Varma > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Initializing global variable to 0 or NULL is not necessary and > > > > > should be avoided. Issue reported by checkpatch script as: > > > > > ERROR: do not initialise globals to 0 (or NULL). > > > > I agree that this is technically correct, but a lot of people don't > > > > seem to know that so we get a lot of comments about this code for > > > > the variables that are not explicitly set. Seems less confusing to > > > > initialize them even if it not necessary. I don't have a > > > > particularly strong opinion on it however. > > > > > > Agree with Alex. > > > > > > Especially for the module parameters we should have a explicit init > > > value for documentation purposes, even when it is 0. > > > > Why is this one tiny driver somehow special compared to the entire rest of > > the kernel? (hint, it isn't...) > > > > Please follow the normal coding style rules, there's no reason to ignore > > them > > unless you like to constantly reject patches like this that get sent to you. > > > > I'll apply the patch, but as a data point, this is the first time I've > gotten a patch to make this change. I get several bug reports or > patches every year to explicitly set values to global variables > because users assume they are not initialized. So it will always be a > trade off as to which patches you want to NACK.
Are you all not running your patches through checkpatch.pl to tell you simple things like this? If no, I suggest you start doing that :) thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ amd-gfx mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
