On 2/1/21 1:19 PM, Christian König wrote:
Am 01.02.21 um 13:07 schrieb Nirmoy Das:
Enable gfx wave limiting for gfx jobs before pushing high priority
compute jobs so that high priority compute jobs gets more resources
to finish early.

Signed-off-by: Nirmoy Das <nirmoy....@amd.com>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c | 9 +++++++++
  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
index 024d0a563a65..ee48989dfb4c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ib.c
@@ -195,6 +195,10 @@ int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned num_ibs,       if ((ib->flags & AMDGPU_IB_FLAG_EMIT_MEM_SYNC) && ring->funcs->emit_mem_sync)
          ring->funcs->emit_mem_sync(ring);
  +    if (ring->funcs->emit_wave_limit && job &&
+        job->base.s_priority >= DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_HIGH)
+        ring->funcs->emit_wave_limit(ring, true);

Since we can only do this for one ring anyway we should probably check the ring priority instead of the job priority.




Alternatively you could put this into begin_use and end_use callbacks of the ring instead of adding an extra callback for this.


I didn't know about begin_use callbacks. I will resend with above suggested changes.


Thanks,

Nirmoy



Christian.

+
      if (ring->funcs->insert_start)
          ring->funcs->insert_start(ring);
  @@ -295,6 +299,11 @@ int amdgpu_ib_schedule(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned num_ibs,
      ring->current_ctx = fence_ctx;
      if (vm && ring->funcs->emit_switch_buffer)
          amdgpu_ring_emit_switch_buffer(ring);
+
+    if (ring->funcs->emit_wave_limit && job &&
+        job->base.s_priority >= DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_HIGH)
+        ring->funcs->emit_wave_limit(ring, false);
+
      amdgpu_ring_commit(ring);
      return 0;
  }

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to