From: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>

The new display synchronization code caused a regression
on all 32-bit architectures:

ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __aeabi_uldivmod
>>> referenced by dce_clock_source.c
>>>               
>>> gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_clock_source.o:(get_pixel_clk_frequency_100hz)
>>>  in archive drivers/built-in.a

ld.lld: error: undefined symbol: __aeabi_ldivmod
>>> referenced by dc_resource.c
>>>               
>>> gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.o:(resource_are_vblanks_synchronizable)
>>>  in archive drivers/built-in.a
>>> referenced by dc_resource.c
>>>               
>>> gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.o:(resource_are_vblanks_synchronizable)
>>>  in archive drivers/built-in.a
>>> referenced by dc_resource.c
>>>               
>>> gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.o:(resource_are_vblanks_synchronizable)
>>>  in archive drivers/built-in.a

This is not a fast path, so the use of an explicit div_u64/div_s64
seems appropriate.

Fixes: 77a2b7265f20 ("drm/amd/display: Synchronize displays with different 
timings")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c    | 12 ++++++------
 .../gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_clock_source.c    |  6 +++---
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c
index 0241c9d96d7a..49214c59c836 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/core/dc_resource.c
@@ -441,15 +441,15 @@ bool resource_are_vblanks_synchronizable(
                if (stream2->timing.pix_clk_100hz*100/stream2->timing.h_total/
                                stream2->timing.v_total > 60)
                        return false;
-               frame_time_diff = (int64_t)10000 *
+               frame_time_diff = div_s64(10000ll *
                        stream1->timing.h_total *
                        stream1->timing.v_total *
-                       stream2->timing.pix_clk_100hz /
-                       stream1->timing.pix_clk_100hz /
-                       stream2->timing.h_total /
-                       stream2->timing.v_total;
+                       stream2->timing.pix_clk_100hz,
+                       stream1->timing.pix_clk_100hz *
+                       stream2->timing.h_total *
+                       stream2->timing.v_total);
                for (i = 0; i < rr_count; i++) {
-                       int64_t diff = (frame_time_diff * 
base60_refresh_rates[i]) / 10 - 10000;
+                       int64_t diff = div_s64(frame_time_diff * 
base60_refresh_rates[i], 10) - 10000;
 
                        if (diff < 0)
                                diff = -diff;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_clock_source.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_clock_source.c
index 6f47f9bab5ee..85ed6f2c9647 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_clock_source.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_clock_source.c
@@ -1013,9 +1013,9 @@ static bool get_pixel_clk_frequency_100hz(
                         * not be programmed equal to DPREFCLK
                         */
                        modulo_hz = REG_READ(MODULO[inst]);
-                       *pixel_clk_khz = ((uint64_t)clock_hz*
-                               
clock_source->ctx->dc->clk_mgr->dprefclk_khz*10)/
-                               modulo_hz;
+                       *pixel_clk_khz = div_u64((uint64_t)clock_hz * 10 *
+                               clock_source->ctx->dc->clk_mgr->dprefclk_khz,
+                               modulo_hz);
                } else {
                        /* NOTE: There is agreement with VBIOS here that MODULO 
is
                         * programmed equal to DPREFCLK, in which case PHASE 
will be
-- 
2.29.2

_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

Reply via email to