Thanks for the info!
- Joshie 🐸✨
On 9/30/21 18:33, Marek Olšák wrote:
The name is kind of correct. It means "64B with no 128B cache line
straddling", which really means just 64B independent blocks with a small
modification to support DCC image stores. They are not true 128B
independent blocks.
Marek
On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:35 PM Joshua Ashton <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Can we please add documentation for this enum?
This was not necessarily a typo, but me misunderstanding and stuff it
working in my testing.
I guess I don't understand why hubp_ind_block_64b_no_128bcl is for 64b
&& 128b when it specifically says "no_128" in the name.
Is there something about it I am missing or is it just misleading
naming?
- Joshie 🐸✨
On 9/30/21 17:14, Marek Olšák wrote:
> I've also amended the version bump that I forgot to do:
>
> -#define KMS_DRIVER_MINOR 43
> +#define KMS_DRIVER_MINOR 44
>
> Marek
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 12:06 PM Alex Deucher
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
>
> Acked-by: Alex Deucher <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:50 AM Marek Olšák
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just discovered this typo. Please review.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Marek
>
