[Public] Does the message need a mention about the newly added option to ignore threshold?
Thanks, Lijo ________________________________ From: amd-gfx <[email protected]> on behalf of Luben Tuikov <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 25, 2021 9:32:20 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: Tuikov, Luben <[email protected]>; Russell, Kent <[email protected]>; Deucher, Alexander <[email protected]> Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Restore information reporting in RAS A recent patch took away the reporting of number of RAS records and the threshold due to the way it was edited/spliced on top of the code. This patch restores this reporting. Cc: Kent Russell <[email protected]> Cc: Alex Deucher <[email protected]> Fixes: 07df2fb092d09e ("drm/amdgpu: Add kernel parameter support for ignoring bad page threshold") Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c index ae64ca02ccc4f8..05117eda105b55 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ras_eeprom.c @@ -1112,7 +1112,10 @@ int amdgpu_ras_eeprom_init(struct amdgpu_ras_eeprom_control *control, res = 0; } else { *exceed_err_limit = true; - dev_err(adev->dev, "GPU will not be initialized. Replace this GPU or increase the threshold."); + dev_err(adev->dev, + "RAS records:%d exceed threshold:%d, " + "GPU will not be initialized. Replace this GPU or increase the threshold", + control->ras_num_recs, ras->bad_page_cnt_threshold); } } } else { base-commit: b60bccb408c831c685b2a257eff575bcda2cbe9d -- 2.33.1.558.g2bd2f258f4
