Looks using 'int r = 0;' is better? Anyway, this patch is: Reviewed-by: Guchun 
Chen <guchun.c...@amd.com>

Regards,
Guchun

-----Original Message-----
From: amd-gfx <amd-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org> On Behalf Of Christian 
König
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 8:16 PM
To: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Koenig, Christian <christian.koe...@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: properly initialize return value during CS

The return value is no longer initialized before the loop because of moving 
code around.

Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koe...@amd.com>
Fixes: 1ce5d2d0c831 ("drm/amdgpu: move entity selection and job init earlier 
during CS")
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
index 58088c663125..e452350f462a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c
@@ -1184,6 +1184,7 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_submit(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
        /* If userptr are invalidated after amdgpu_cs_parser_bos(), return
         * -EAGAIN, drmIoctl in libdrm will restart the amdgpu_cs_ioctl.
         */
+       r = 0;
        amdgpu_bo_list_for_each_userptr_entry(e, p->bo_list) {
                struct amdgpu_bo *bo = ttm_to_amdgpu_bo(e->tv.bo);
 
--
2.25.1

Reply via email to