Am 22.08.23 um 08:17 schrieb Yifan Zhang:
current method doesn't work for GTT domain page table, change
it to support both VRAM and GTT domain.

Signed-off-by: Yifan Zhang <yifan1.zh...@amd.com>

Of hand that looks like the right thing to do, one comment below.

With that fixed feel free to add my Acked-by, but Shashank should probably take a look as well.

Thanks,
Christian.

---
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.c | 6 ++----
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.h | 2 +-
  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.c
index 10ce5557bb11..ee957f059786 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.c
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ int amdgpu_mes_create_process(struct amdgpu_device *adev, 
int pasid,
        process->vm = vm;
        process->pasid = pasid;
        process->process_quantum = adev->mes.default_process_quantum;
-       process->pd_gpu_addr = amdgpu_bo_gpu_offset(vm->root.bo);
+       process->pd_phys_addr = amdgpu_gmc_pd_addr(vm->root.bo);
amdgpu_mes_unlock(&adev->mes);
        return 0;
@@ -621,9 +621,7 @@ int amdgpu_mes_add_hw_queue(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int 
gang_id,
        /* add hw queue to mes */
        queue_input.process_id = gang->process->pasid;
- queue_input.page_table_base_addr =
-               adev->vm_manager.vram_base_offset + gang->process->pd_gpu_addr -
-               adev->gmc.vram_start;
+       queue_input.page_table_base_addr =gang->process->pd_phys_addr;
queue_input.process_va_start = 0;
        queue_input.process_va_end =
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.h 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.h
index a27b424ffe00..e1c20e2453c7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.h
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ struct amdgpu_mes {
  struct amdgpu_mes_process {
        int                     pasid;
        struct                  amdgpu_vm *vm;
-       uint64_t                pd_gpu_addr;
+       uint64_t                pd_phys_addr;

phys_addr for physical address is quite a bit misleading since this isn't a physical address at all. It's actually using the PDE format.

The entry in the job structure is equally bad named because of historical reasons.

Maybe a name like root_pde or something similar would be better.

Regards,
Christian.


        struct amdgpu_bo        *proc_ctx_bo;
        uint64_t                proc_ctx_gpu_addr;
        void                    *proc_ctx_cpu_ptr;

Reply via email to