[
http://jira.amdatu.org/jira/browse/AMDATU-131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=10162#comment-10162
]
Angelo van der Sijpt commented on AMDATU-131:
---------------------------------------------
It might indeed be a good idea to have a storage impl per service that simply
uses the bundle storage for services without a default implementation, and to
use the default (probably also bundle-storage based) storage for those that do.
In that light, we could probably get by with creating very simple
bundle-storage based implementations for things like TenantDAO, and not need
some specific centralized storage.
> Implement Simple persistent storage for Amdatu core
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AMDATU-131
> URL: http://jira.amdatu.org/jira/browse/AMDATU-131
> Project: Amdatu
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Platform - Persistence
> Affects Versions: 0.0.6
> Reporter: Ivo Ladage - van Doorn
> Assignee: Ivo Ladage - van Doorn
> Fix For: 0.0.6
>
>
> Some simple storage engine needs to be used to store roles for UserAdmin,
> configuration for ConfigurationAdmin and tenants for the tenant service.
> There are a lot of (open source) options, most of them described on this
> page: http://java-source.net/open-source/database-engines
> The main question however is I think; what do we require from this storage?
> Requirements:
> -1- Very lightweight; small in size, low memory footprint, etc.
> -2- Low software/hardware requirements (i.e. supports Java 1.3)
> -3- The storage engine must be open source and provide a Java API
> -4- A simple web-based GUI would be nice, though not required
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
