Hi, I would oppose this proposal as SimpleStorage is probably not linear scalable and automated clustered, which violates the goal of creating a cloud fabric framework. Unless of course we make SimpleStorage compliant with those goals.
Martijn From: amdatu-developers-bounces at amdatu.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ivo Ladage-van Doorn Sent: vrijdag 12 november 2010 8:55 To: amdatu-developers at amdatu.org Subject: Re: [Amdatu-developers] On using Cassandra for non-big data More on this subject is described on the WIKI page http://amdatu.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=1605717. I ran into consistency issues with Cassandra during several integration tests, after digging into the issue I created this WIKI page. Regards, Ivo From: amdatu-developers-bounces at amdatu.org [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Angelo van der Sijpt Sent: donderdag 11 november 2010 17:50 To: amdatu-developers at amdatu.org Subject: [Amdatu-developers] On using Cassandra for non-big data Hi List, Bram, Ivo and I just had a discussion on the way we should use Cassandra for our storage. As Cassandra uses the 'eventually consistent' semantics, it might not the best solution for some of our problems, e.g. the Tenant storage. We propose to remove Cassandra as a default storage for most of the services, replacing it by the SimpleStorage that Bram is currently working on, and only use Cassandra for real 'big data' situations. Any other thoughts? Angelo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.amdatu.org/pipermail/amdatu-developers/attachments/20101123/e0b86707/attachment.html
