On 5 May 2011, at 11:26 , Bram de Kruijff wrote: > Hi Marcel, > > 2011/5/5 Marcel Offermans <[email protected]>: >> Hey all, >> I created a document on versioning semantics, based on the recently released >> whitepaper by the OSGi Alliance. Please review and provide feedback. >> http://www.amdatu.org/confluence/display/Amdatu/Versioning+Semantics > > I understand it so its probably well explained and IMHO it makes sense > to adopt these best practices. The key things, assuming that bnd does > its job, that we may wanna bring back in the conventions / reviews > checklist is "use of packageinfo", "use of odd numbers for > development", "use of provide:=true for provider code". > > Finally, I think this information should be in the Project > Contributors section of the wiki next to conventions and the likes as > it is not architecture and is cross-cutting to Amdatu as a whole. IMHO > the OSGi tree under Architecture is a questionable collection of > random data and should be moved/deleted.
I completely agree about moving it to a more appropriate place (plus all the other OSGi content). Greetings, Marcel _______________________________________________ Amdatu-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.amdatu.org/mailman/listinfo/amdatu-developers
