Mikael Nordman <mikael.nord...@pp1.inet.fi>
writes:

> Hi Enoch,
> For your information, FlashForth has these robustness mechanisms built
> in.
>
> The aim has been to make it so robust that a reflash should never be
> needed.
>
> The Kernel is write protected, the memory allocation pointers in eeprom
> are initialized from write protected flash with the EMPTY command.
>
> At boot time all dynamic data is first initialized from write protected
> flash.
> It is then up to the application to do whatever further initialization
> that is needed. That also includes setting up the application dependent
> IRQ vectors in ram. 
>
> MARKER is also supported. it restores flash, eeprom and ram allocation
> pointers. 
>
>
> BR Mikael
>
> http://flashforth.sourceforge.net

Thanks, I thought that your work was just Microchip centric.

Generally speaking, I prefer OSS development efforts to be merge-ing
rather than fork-ing :-)

Before selecting "Amforth" I tested the "avrforth" project which I found
quite dormant. Project development activity is one of the deciding
factors and Amforth, thanks to Matthias relentless work, gets very high
marks.

Sincerely, Enoch.

>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
> Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
> Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_feb
_______________________________________________
Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/
Amforth-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel

Reply via email to