Hi ENoch, > Here is my current solution to eliminating defer indirection in simple > forward reference cases: > > variable back&forth > \ use forward referenced word > : forth& dp back&forth ! -1 , ; immediate > \ use forward referenced xt > : &forth postpone (literal) -1 , dp 1- back&forth ! ; immediate > \ forward reference resolver (put anywhere in referenced word) > : &back& latest @ back&forth @ !i ; immediate > > \ 1st calling 2nd examples: > \ > \ : first1 ." first1 " forth& ; > \ : second1 ." second1" &back& ; > \ > \ : first2 ." first2 " &forth execute ; > \ : second2 ." second2" &back& ; > > Comments or is this "cookbook grade" :-)
What is the expected output? The wording of your new commands didn't help (me) either. I tried to refactor it to variable fxt : >fxt dp fxt ! -1 , ; immediate : <fxt latest @ fxt @ !i ; immediate But it is a hidden thing, what the &forth should do. I had the impression, that a forward declaration could be used multiple times, so it should be resolved not only once. I do not see anything even nearby in your code. Sorry, you lost me Matthias ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/ Amforth-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel
