Hi Enoch, > I am pleased to advise that I managed "to marry" in amforth-shadow (#1) > Multitasking with Soft-Interrupts (#2) and have the advantage of the two > worlds (synchronous and asynchronous processings, respectively).
Sounds good. > #1 https://github.com/wexi/amforth-shadow There you write However, still in HQ’s trunk@1650 those ISRs should run with the hardware interrupt system disabled What makes you think so? It easy to re-enable the interrupts within an ISR and get a nestable interrupt service. IMHO it works exactly the same way as the controller does it. To have a short ISR is simply good style... > #2 aka Second Level Interrupt Handling (SLIH) I remember that, and still think that it is overly complex and not needed, see above. And now the big BUT: I appreciate your work, really. Matthias ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want excitement? Manually upgrade your production database. When you want reliability, choose Perforce Perforce version control. Predictably reliable. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157508191&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/ Amforth-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel
