Hi Enoch,

> I don't see the benefit of automatically collecting my uploaded file
> names into the firmware.

Just don't define a wordlist with the name uploaded-wl.
It not part of the default (or any other) configuration. 
I should write a recipe for it, it seems.

>  In fact, it's a sort of spying after the
> developer...

Ouch. That's what Open Source is good at ;)

Seriosly: It makes the require statement a really 
useful instruction, esp when working with modules.
It prevents uploading files that are already
present, even if the shell session is (for what
ever reason) restarted.

A release management for production quality
code that deserves this name will of course 
not include such information. See above.

>  an unnecessary firmware bloating...

Again: see above.

> 
> Can you please make this feature at least a command line option that is
> disabled by default.

I'll think about it.

>  Most users won't use it and the failed run-time
> tests to uploaded-wl existence are annoying.

Removing the message is easy (in fact, its an artifact).

And what "most" users think about it... I know of two 
other users that use it (except me) and now of one who
doesn't. Makes 3:1. Not relly "most". In neither respect.

Matthias

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/
Amforth-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel

Reply via email to