Hi Enoch, > I don't see the benefit of automatically collecting my uploaded file > names into the firmware.
Just don't define a wordlist with the name uploaded-wl. It not part of the default (or any other) configuration. I should write a recipe for it, it seems. > In fact, it's a sort of spying after the > developer... Ouch. That's what Open Source is good at ;) Seriosly: It makes the require statement a really useful instruction, esp when working with modules. It prevents uploading files that are already present, even if the shell session is (for what ever reason) restarted. A release management for production quality code that deserves this name will of course not include such information. See above. > an unnecessary firmware bloating... Again: see above. > > Can you please make this feature at least a command line option that is > disabled by default. I'll think about it. > Most users won't use it and the failed run-time > tests to uploaded-wl existence are annoying. Removing the message is easy (in fact, its an artifact). And what "most" users think about it... I know of two other users that use it (except me) and now of one who doesn't. Makes 3:1. Not relly "most". In neither respect. Matthias ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/ Amforth-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel