Hi Bill, > I was thinking that AmForth would be a good starting point for porting to > other architectures, given that > 1) It's nicely modularized. > 2) Many of the words are written in forth, but expressed in assembler. > 3) the assembler syntax is relatively generic, and probably easily ported. > (so, something like core/bin.asm stays looking about like it does now, even > if the CPU architecture changes drastically.) > > Am I out of my mind?
IMHO no > Is there a better starting point? I've played with the naken_asm recently. It is not (yet?) able to do the job for the atmega's but a msp430 variant looks promising. > The actual target is an STM32F103 ARM chip. Don't suggest C > implementations; that's not what I want to do. Of course not ;) If the msp430 port is successful it's probably easier to start for another system. Currently, there are a lot of things that work for the atmegas but not for others. Matthias ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/ Amforth-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel
