> 
> Yes, I'm aware of this. I was hoping to get some help here, how to
> (re)configure AmForth to make it work with the thing the way I want.

I doubt that it is a reconfiguration only. You'll have to change
some very basic things in the heart of amforth.

> it's feasible when using indirect-threaded Forth. So giving up the
> Flash would be a waste. Why? What for? Certainly it can and should
> work the way I require.

The 162 dosn't have that much flash (16KB), amforth with all bells and
whistles comes close to that. Thus I think, there won't be much
space to be wasted.

Anyway: Good luck it's a nice project. If you have any questions, 
feel free to ask.

Matthias

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your
hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a
look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/
Amforth-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel

Reply via email to