I seem to remember that I had the same problem a few weeks ago when I got started with AMForth.
Cannot confirm this from where I am now, but I think that <builds is not predefined and therefore its definition should be included on top of the bitnames file. The error codes are listed in the Forth2012 documentation (google it) and -13 should be for a not defined Forth word. Peter > On 19 Dec 2015, at 07:27, Richard Burden <richard.burden.pe...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm trying to load bitnames.frt into my version of amForth and getting errors. > > eg >> : bitmask: ( C: "ccc" portadr bmask -- ) ( R: -- pinmask portadr ) > ok <builds > ?? -13 9 >> , , > ?? -4 6 >> does> > ok >> dup @i swap i-cell+ @i > ok >> ; > > I can confirm the files do-value.asm and do-defer.asm were included in > the build after reviewing the list file. Can anyone help me on this > please? > > Bitnames.frt was fine on amForthv5.5 so I assume the new word <builds > is the source of the problem. > > Many thanks > Richard > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/ > Amforth-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Amforth-devel mailing list for http://amforth.sf.net/ Amforth-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amforth-devel
