|
Raj, I wouldn’t call myself an expert,
but there are many good reasons for purchasing data. Some of these
include: ·
Cleaner,
more stable data ·
Robust
download utilities ·
Historical
management of the data on your system. For example, if a split
occurs many vendors flag it so that the historical data for that symbol is
downloaded. I.e., you could get the daily data for all of your symbols
and 5 years of adjusted data for one symbol. ·
Easy
availability of fundamental and other data. For example, if you used Quotes
Plus data in AB and and you wanted to retrieve the number of shares outstanding
for a symbol, you would execute the AB function GetExtraData("shares"). This data
is available on the web, but you’d have to retrieve it and save
it. That’s not easy (I know; I’ve done it.) ·
Mutual
Fund data is a source of contention. Some vendors do pretty good
job. Others are quite poor. From forum threads, I understand
that Yahoo Mutual Fund data is pretty bad. Others should
comment on this more. Any analytical system is composed of a
data management portion and an analysis portion. Most people assume
that the analysis portion is the most difficult and grossly underestimate the
difficulty of managing their data. Most people correctly assess the
analysis portion as being complex. However, they massively UNDERESTIMATE the
complexity of the data management portion believing it to be pretty
straight-forward. Quite frankly, that’s what I’m hearing from
you. That’s an old saying in the If you are going to invest or trade your
hard-earned money, consider using a data vendor that provides the type of data
you need. If you decide to use Yahoo or your broker, plan on
spending more time on the data management task. Regards, Dan. * In the 1930’s, the From: I was wondering y should we
pay for data. yahoo provides free data
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
|
- RE: [amibroker] DATA FETCHING FROM YAHOO SERVER USING AFL Dan Clark
