ChrisB,

I am finding through optimization results that a time period should 
be used to determine when to get out of a trade placed according to 
a TREND -based  buy signal.

I am also finding that oscillator signals work great for determining 
exits. My favorite is the % Bollinger Band, for doing this, although 
I mix it with two other indicators that confirm the %BB signal (it's 
all determined by the % results for each signal, after everything is 
weighted and combined.

Overall, though, I get more profit with weekly trades over anything 
else. So I am obviously trend oriented. The oscillators are good for 
daily entry points, within the trend. Woodies CCI is great for 
seeing the dips which are then confirmed by other oscillators~
The goal of course being to reduce the risk, and not build some 
super-fancy over-optimized system. When given the choice to select a 
type of indicator or signal amongst a group of nicely-performing 
signals, I always favor items that will naturally support my 
discretionary style. Whatever reduces the emotions to a feeling of 
trust in the numbers...

~Brian


--- In [email protected], "Herman van den Bergen" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I simply try to trade price patterns based on a handfull of minute 
bars... I
> expect profitable conditions to exist early in the trade, not near 
the end.
> If a trade doesn't behave as expected soon i feel like gambling, 
or trying
> to get lucky, and I rather get out and wait for another 
opportunity.
> 
> While this may sound easy it isn't and a lot of work goes into 
peripheral
> code to trade patterns automatically.
> 
> best regards,
> herman
> 
> 
>   -----Original Message-----
>   From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of kris45mar
>   Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 10:41 AM
>   To: [email protected]
>   Subject: RE: [amibroker] Short system advice?
> 
> 
>   Herman,
> 
>   thanks for the reply.
> 
>   Presumably one would have a high win ratio (% of winners) with 
these short
> term systems, and smaller pay off ratios?
> 
>   When exits are based on price action or price targets alone, and 
they do
> not reach the profit target, would you use a time based stop?
> 
>   If not then one could assume we could use oscillators that will 
continue
> to oscillate and return a sell signal, even if price does not 
reach the
> target?
> 
>   Or indicators that have a time based decay such as parabolic SAR?
> 
>   ChrisB
> 
>   Herman van den Bergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>     Hi Chris,
> 
>     Yes i like to develop short term systems: the shorter the 
better,
> usually 1-10 minute trades. imo, The significance of a signal 
fades quickly.
> And yes, I meant ApplyStop() type stops where you set the position 
to close
> at a given % trade DD. Invariably maxloss stops make me "lock in 
Losses" and
> the price goes my way after I close the position. I don't use 
complicated
> stops and perhaps that is the problem. I find it better to develop 
system
> without and kind of profit/loss stops, just the basic system 
working on
> signals only. Almost always after i have that working adding 
profit stops
> will increase profits and adding Max Loss stops decrease profits.
> 
>     best regards,
>     herman
> 
> 
>       -----Original Message-----
>       From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of kris45mar
>       Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 7:29 AM
>       To: [email protected]
>       Subject: RE: [amibroker] Short system advice?
> 
> 
>       Herman
> 
>       Could I trouble you to expand on that briefly?:
> 
>       by "max stop loss" I presume you mean an initial capital 
protection as
> per
>       Applystop(stoptypeloss,...,......) or similar.
> 
>       or do you mean trailing stops as in
>       Applystop(stoptypetrailing,..., ..., ... ?
> 
>       I appreciate your systems may be shorter term, rather than 
longer.
> 
>       Only ask because this w/e I have been reviewing all my 
trades since
> Jan 2004 (ASX markets, stocks, long only, trend following) and 
found that it
> is my trailing stops (whatever volatility parameter), that 
curtailed my
> results, (together with emotions etc but that is another story). I 
might
> look at locking in the stop at breakeven, then only trailing when 
there is a
> pattern/retracement/consolidation above each successive R-multiple 
profit
> level, starting at 3R. This would have served me far better in the 
trending
> market we have experienced over the last few years.
> 
>       I am beginning to think that for shorter term systems, 
initial Capital
> protection stops may prematurely halt the cyclical nature of 
whatever is
> causing the system to work, but need to get to grips with more 
coding and
> backtesting skills to confim this.
> 
>       Your comments would be most appreciated.
> 
>       ChrisB
> 
> 
> 
>       Herman van den Bergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>         stocks have "character" some work Long and some work short 
and some
> work both ways. Same wrt rhythmic and other characteristics...imho 
there is
> no reason why we should assume any characteristic to be permanent 
or common
> to a large population.
> 
>         When designing a system I try to find similar performance 
for Long
> and Short, this gives me more confidence that I won't go broke in 
a strong
> trend. Systems that only work Long or Short make me nervous as I 
worry that
> they will stop working abruptly. Sometimes, most of the time I 
should say...
> it is necessary to adjust parameters individually for long and 
short. I try
> to develop systems that give me thousands of trades (minute time 
frame) and
> produce a nice smooth surfaces on the 3D charts. I never trust 
systems that
> give me more than one significant hotspot.
> 
>         wrt indicator, I don't use any. I trade only very short 
term
> patterns - I am a skeptic on the use of traditional indicators. 
Never got
> any to work well - probably because I don't have the patience (or 
nerve) to
> sit through long trades and through major DDs.
> 
>         tips? don't use any max loss stops, imho they kill 
systems. Use
> profit stops instead. Design both Entries and exits individually, 
only
> rarely will an entry rule give same performance as an exit rule. 
The
> exception to this may be high speed automated reversal trading 
systems
> (50-100 trades a day) that are in the market full time
> 
>         jmo... from a developer's viewpoint, I enjoy development 
more than
> trading :-)
> 
>         herman






------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Try Online Currency Trading with GFT. Free 50K Demo. Trade 
24 Hours. Commission-Free. 
http://us.click.yahoo.com/RvFikB/9M2KAA/U1CZAA/GHeqlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.

To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to 
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com

For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


Reply via email to