wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have looked at the eSignal code and not counting the fact that
it is 20 times longer than AFL formula,
> it is doing the same thing as:
>
> HaClose = (O+H+L+C)/4;
> HaOpen = AMA( Ref( HaClose, -1 ), 0.5 );
> HaHigh = Max( H, Max( HaClose, HaOpen ) );
> HaLow = Min( L, Min( HaClose, HaOpen ) );
>
> PlotOHLC( HaOpen, HaHigh, HaLow, HaClose, "Modified " + Name(),
colorBlack, styleCandle );
>
> So, you must be using different data.
> Note that Haikin-Ashi is using recursive formulation and the
results you are getting will be different
> depending on NUMBER OF BARS that are used in calculation.
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Janeczko
> amibroker.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Tomasz Janeczko
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 1:11 AM
> Subject: Re: [amibroker] Heikin-Ashi code modification as per e-
signal help needed:
>
>
> If eSignal produces different chart it means that its
implementation is wrong or you are using different data (settings).
>
> I have talked with Dan Valcu and AmiBroker implementation that
you quoted at the end of your e-mail
> follows precisely his original idea, and exactly this
description:
>
> # haClose = (O+H+L+C)/4
> # haOpen = (haOpen (previous bar) + haClose (previous bar))/2
> # haHigh = Maximum(H, haOpen, haClose)
> # haLow = Minimum(L, haOpen, haClose)
>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz Janeczko
> amibroker.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: nebt1
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 1:00 AM
> Subject: [amibroker] Heikin-Ashi code modification as per e-
signal help needed:
>
>
> Hi e-signal using somewhat different code for Heikin-Ashi then
> presently
> available AmiBroker code for it. Chart comes out different as
well
> on e-signal Heikin-Ashi.
> Here is the code and explanations from e-signal by Dan Valcu:
> http://r7.com/ashi.htm
>
> CALCULATION
>
> The heikin-ashi candlestick technique uses modified open-high-
low-
> close (OHLC) values and displays them as candlesticks. The
modified
> values are computed using these definitions:
>
> # haClose = (O+H+L+C)/4
> # haOpen = (haOpen (previous bar) + haClose (previous bar))/2
> # haHigh = Maximum(H, haOpen, haClose)
> # haLow = Minimum(L, haOpen, haClose)
>
> The "open," "high," "low," and "close" referred to are of the
> current bar. The prefix ha- indicates the corresponding heikin-
ashi
> modified values. I have used daily data throughout this
article, so
> one bar represents one trading day. Depending on the trading
time
> frame, you may employ other data, such as intraday, weekly, or
> monthly.
>
> The value haOpen is always set to the midpoint of the body of
the
> previous bar, while haClose is computed as the average price
of the
> current bar. The modified high, haHigh, is chosen as the
highest
> value of the set {real high (H), modified open (haOpen), and
> modified close (haClose)}. The same logic applies to the
definition
> of the modified low: It is the lowest value in the set {real
low
> (L), modified open (haOpen), and modified close (haClose)}.
> ======
> AmiBroker code that I presently have is as follows:
>
> _SECTION_BEGIN("Haikin Ashi");
> HaClose = (O+H+L+C)/4;
> HaOpen = AMA( Ref( HaClose, -1 ), 0.5 );
> HaHigh = Max( H, Max( HaClose, HaOpen ) );
> HaLow = Min( L, Min( HaClose, HaOpen ) );
>
> PlotOHLC( HaOpen, HaHigh, HaLow, HaClose, "Modified " + Name
(),
> colorBlack, styleCandle );
> _SECTION_END();
> ======
> Please, someone, translate that e-signal code into AFL
AmiBroker.
> tia, Ben
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Please note that this group is for discussion between users
only.
>
> To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly
to
> SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
>
> For other support material please check also:
> http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
>
>
>
>
>
> SPONSORED LINKS Investment management software Real estate
investment software Investment property software
> Software support Real estate investment analysis
software Investment software
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> a.. Visit your group "amibroker" on the web.
>
> b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
---------
>
Hi Tomasz,
Thanks for a reply, woodie from cci club uses e-signal formula quite
well and we both had IB data with different results using Heikin
Ashi today.
>From what i see HaOpen calculated in e-signal uses (open+close)/2
previous bar and afl formula does it with close only/2??? I am not
afl programmer,
and i don't doubt that afl language is shorter... but could there be
still difference in results cause of HaOpen calculations in both?
tia, Ben
Please note that this group is for discussion between users only.
To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to
SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com
For other support material please check also:
http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
SPONSORED LINKS
| Investment management software | Real estate investment software | Investment property software |
| Software support | Real estate investment analysis software | Investment software |
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
- Visit your group "amibroker" on the web.
- To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
