Yahoo data 101 - Appendix 1 Ron,
Thanks for your prompt reply. The purpose of my email was, out of fairness, to give your company the opportunity to present their position. I think your answer does that. It will be posted on the website in the appropriate place. Regards, Brian B. Ron Franz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thank you for your email. I just verified that SEED history is now available on Yahoo. Unfortunately I do not have a complete answer to your comment. We only supply the data to Yahoo they manipulate the data and are responsible for there website. But this does happen when a stock symbol is changed sometimes and Yahoo has to manually correct the problem. So if you see this problem occur please let me know and I will forward it to Yahoo. Thanks again, CSI TECHNICAL SUPPORT wrote: -----Original Message----- From: Brian.B [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 8:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Yahoo historical data Dear Sir/Ms, I am a member of a forum that discusses stockmarket software issues. Recently the accuracy of Yahoo historical data was questioned. A forum member came up with the example of SEED. The historical data for SEED was recently unavailable. The historical data at the site was current only to early June as of the beginning of July and attempts to download data returned an 'unavailable' comment. I undertook to make enquiries on behalf of the group as to the reasons for this and what procedures your company uses to ensure Yahoo historical data accuracy. Regards, Brian Burney. --------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Music: Check out the gig guide for live music in your area --- In [email protected], "brian.z123" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello Ryan, > > Thanks for that. > > I agree there is an anomaly regarding SEED. > I am still tracking that one down. > > Could you provide any further examples or comment. > > Part of the problem occurs when transporting symbol lists across > time and between databases e.g. the 'Helmscott files' are dated 2005. > > Nothing to do with the case of the strange SEED though. > > Brian. > > --- In [email protected], Ryan Daniel <macprogrammer@> > wrote: > > > > I am so glad you brought this up. I noticed that the > > data that comes from Yahoo's historical (through AmiQuote) > > is full of holes. See stock symbol SEED. Not sure about MSN. > > I would consider registering AmiQuote if I knew the data > > from one of it's sources was reliable. At any rate, I've been > > updating by download each night from the free EODDATA website. > > So far their data has been rock solid, very clean, and > > includes IPOs pretty quickly after they launch. > > > > Can anyone pipe in about this. Does the data get any better > > once you register AmiQuote (I like AmiQuote and think it > > works well. I realize that the problem is with the data source > > and not necessarily AmiQuote). > > > > > > > > --- matrix10014 <allansn@> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > Just setting up Ami,for the first time and was wondering if > there were > > > any strong feelings regarding yahoo EOD vs Quotes plus?? > > > > > > Any major benefits or drawbacks?? > > > > > > Any insight appreciated > > > > > > Allan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > Please note that this group is for discussion between users only. To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com For other support material please check also: http://www.amibroker.com/support.html Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
