Hi Bob, thanks for jumping in. Let me find the bottom line re. SI Pro:
"Each new CD is a snapshot of the updated database with current values for those fields. While it does offer multiple quarters and years for sales, earnings, etc., you don't get a continuous history of those items." Looking at their field list, take EPS Q1-8 This really comprises 8 separate, different fields (or "keys" as Joe mentioned) on the CD: EPS Q1 EPS Q2 . . EPS Q8 This is the "historical data" available per cd. Now the only way to build a historical database, as you describe at the conference, is by having all past CD's. Say, for a 2- years back database I'd need about 24 CD's. Well actually, for many items like EPS, with 24 CD's I'd have the values 4 years back because each CD goes back up to Q8, but other fields only have the most recent value, so I'd need 24 CD's to have 2- years historicals of ALL fields (outside of the SI Pro program, in its most basic form: a weekly .csv file containing historical values of all their fundamental fields. I could achieve this by exporting data from each CD separately to .csv files.) If I'm correct so far, the only question that remains is: is the data of past CD's somehow available, like for download from the site? If I'm not correct, well, please correct me :) Thanks much guys for your patience. -treliff --- In [email protected], "Bob Krishfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Joe > > I previously subscribed to AAII's SI Pro for many years. It does not > give you a database of historical fundamentals. Each new CD is a > snapshot of the updated database with current values for those fields. > While it does offer multiple quarters and years for sales, earnings, > etc., you don't get a continuous history of those items. > > I asked the AAII people at their conference, how to make a historical > data base to see how fundamentals changed over several quarters and do > performance reporting like they do on their screens. They use their > large server farm to install multiple databases, i.e. one for each > month or period they want to include in their comparisons, and then > they must run the SI program against that database for that set of > queries, save the results, shutdown the program and repeat the process > for each point in time. No magic here. > > Bob Krishfield > > > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Joe Landry" <jelandry@> wrote: > > > > Treliff and Brian > > I've got more work to do to understand what's in the one years > subscription > > of SIPro with multiple CDs but > > here's an interim reply on keys...they are the field labels, or the > column > > headings. Databases > > use keys with which to organize the data and the export function > outputs > > both the > > keys in a small file and the data in a much larger file in one > step. BTW > > you can choose the > > database, portfolio or screening subset to export. > > > > For example the keys are the XLS column headings but in a separate file. > > Company Name - Ticker - Exchange - SMG - IMG - Cash Flow Growth > 12m - > > Sales Growth 12m...... Sales Growth 7yr > > > > I thought you had a separate Fundamentals forum but I can see where the > > files are being placed. > > > > Planning to load more than one CD sequentially to see if a new month's > > version updates common fields or > > if it adds additional history to the set. > > > > Best regards > > JOE > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "treliff" <treliff@> > > To: <[email protected]> > > Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2006 10:33 PM > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Historical Fundamental Data > > > > > > > NOTE: > > > > > > I just wanted to submit a reply to Brian and Joe's earlier posts when > > > I noted Brian's newest. Allow me to post mine anyway with apparently > > > some similar requests to Joe re. SI Pro. > > > > > > Brian thanks for your gargantuan effort in listing all the sites. > > > Forgive me though for pointing out that the heading: > > > > > > 1. most likely sites for exportable historical fundamental data > > > > > > seems very optimistic. I have not visited all sites but many I know > > > and know OF that they do not include hist. fundas, at least not on > > > individual stocks (for example tradestools I just visited has index > > > data only). SI Pro still seems the best bet so far (for US stocks). > > > > > > Anyway my original reply: > > > > > > Joe, thanks very much for explaining about SI Pro export. I'm not > > > sure what is a "key", is it one of the main categories like > > > > > > Balance Sheet (Annual) > > > Growth Rates > > > Multiples > > > > > > as used in their field list > > > > > > http://aaii.com/stockinvestor/programinfo/SIProFieldList.pdf > > > > > > If I counted correctly there are 20 of these "categories" and you > > > mention 22 tables/files so I assume one can export one category at a > > > time. Still not clear exactly what a "key" is. If indeed you could > > > post some in the files section that would be great. > > > > > > One other thing, if I may. On the AAII site it says: > > > > > > "Quarterly data is available from the last eight quarters and annual > > > data spans the last seven years" > > > > > > Does that mean that every separate (monthly) CD contains data back as > > > in the quote above? Or does a monthly CD only contain the past > > > month's data? > > > > > > Joe sorry for requests piling up on you. I guess we could just go for > > > the money back guarantee: > > > > > > "Test Stock Investor Pro on your PC, for as long as a year, before > > > you decide if it is right for you." > > > > > > but without further explanation. I assume one pays the full yearly > > > fee and if not satisfied, try to get reimbursed. Seems like a great > > > deal, too good to be true really, so probably not as easy as it > > > sounds indeed. (I'd be the last to ask money back if the service is > > > indeed what I expect, let me get that straight :) > > > > > > Brian, re. "kicking out the previous value" indeed I mean that at > > > most sites only the current (most recent) value is available. With a > > > QP subscription there is no way to trace last April's short interest > > > on the stock (just an example), 1st) because the QP site doesn't give > > > access to these hist. data (if they have stored it at all), 2nd) > > > because AB does not store past values in an array (and btw neither > > > does it this with the new Yahoo fundas): yesterday's value is lost > > > once today's value is imported (please correct me if I'm wrong). > > > > > > Now even within these limitations the various sites have their > > > nuances. Brian, you might as well leave tbsp out (I use `m for option > > > data) because their funda fields are very few and there is even no > > > way to export them from their analysis program (and it doesn't store > > > historicals, of course). > > > > > > With Zacks, which I have used since Nov '05 to start building > > > historicals (I chose Zacks because of their Zacks rank and upcoming > > > earnings dates) I do it the hard way: run a screen, copy/paste the > > > data from the web page into excel, run a macro pre-crunching the data > > > and shuffling everything into 6 columns (OHLCVI) for AB ascii import > > > using good'ol artificial tickers 2_MSFT, 3_MSFT etc. (Let me just > > > mention I had to google "SQL" so that's probably not for me...) > > > > > > Meanwhile I have built a half year's data but I was only able to > > > focus on a limited amount of fields because, in combination with a > > > large amount of stocks, the webscreener just can't handle anymore. Of > > > course it wasn't intended for this kind of use, but I have e- mailed > > > Zacks and asked if I could BUY the raw data but nope, they don't > > > offer this. (On 2nd thought, after a few months copy/pasting, it > > > turns out the data quality is terrible, aarrggh...). > > > > > > So it's free but sloppy and I'd prefer to pay a fair amount for a > > > neat .csv if only historicals were included. > > > > > > Thanks again All for the discussion so far. > > > > > > -treliff > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "brian.z123" <brian.z123@> wrote: > > >> > > >> Third time lucky? > > >> > > >> http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/files/Fundamental% > > >> 20Data/ > > >> > > >> --- In [email protected], "brian.z123" <brian.z123@> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Hello Joe, > > >> > > > >> > Thanks to you and also treliff for jumping in and putting some > > >> > weight on the oars; we have moved a little further up the stream. > > >> > > > >> > I think there will be a lot more questions about the subject when > > >> > the SQL plug-in comes out. > > >> > It is all new to me, as it will be to most others. > > >> > Prior to this I couldn't find a retail program that would allow > > > me > > >> > to use fdata inputs in formulas. > > >> > Of course, I haven't tried every single program e.g I bypassed > > >> > Tradestation as it is 'trading platform' based and since 9/11 USA > > >> > regulators have tightened up on foreign investors and TS no > > > longer > > >> > accepts accounts from US non-residents. > > >> > Prior to this I did my funda analysis by manually entering data > > > to > > >> > Xcel, and that was for the Aussie market only. > > >> > > > >> > So for the list of sites I have posted there are a lot of > > >> questions > > >> > to be answered and trefill's question is one of the more > > > important > > >> > ones. > > >> > > > >> > 'Will an AAII subscription truly enable me to pour all past data > > >> > into a .csv file?' > > >> > > > >> > It is a question equally as relevant to all the sites. > > >> > > > >> > The reason I posted the list in the first place was because the > > >> > inititial reaction of many would be to go straight for the AAII > > >> > version or perhaps similar sources. > > >> > By questioning a little further perhaps we will find about the > > >> pros > > >> > and cons of each site in advance, and in some cases, save > > >> ourselves > > >> > some time and money. > > >> > There are also going to be additional problems with f databases > > >> > compared to price databases; price only comprises 6 fields > > >> > (OHLCVOI), the fields/formats are standard across all providers, > > >> > data is precisely time dependent, data is continuous and > > > histories > > >> > are complete and deep in most cases i.e apples = apples almost > > >> every > > >> > time. > > >> > The opposite applies to fdata in all five areas. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Re your comments. > > >> > > > >> > No it is not more than we need to know. > > >> > It is spot on. > > >> > > > >> > So far, as I understand it, AAII has 100-200 data fields > > > available > > >> > with varying number of years available for each. > > >> > The screening software will export in a suitable format for AB > > > but > > >> > it will not export the database in its entirety in one step. > > >> > AB users would need to export,say, 5-10 segments of the database > > >> > separately and then join them together if they wanted one > > > database. > > >> > Alternatively they could just keep them as,say, 10 separate SQL > > >> > bases. > > >> > > > >> > If this is correct, it leaves us with a big question mark over > > > the > > >> > use of the keys (what are they and what are they for) and also > > > the > > >> > timing of the updates (weekly/monthly are always lagging updates). > > >> > There is also a minor question of whether the database will > > > always > > >> > be 7yrs/8qtrs or is it growing each year? > > >> > > > >> > The files re this topic are at the Fundamental Data folder; menu > > >> at > > >> > the top left corner of this page>files?fundamental data. > > >> > > > >> > I think this will take users to it: > > >> > > > >> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fundamental data > > >> > > > >> > If you can post a .csv of one table downloaded for as many years > > >> as > > >> > you can get, with the relevant key, that would be great. > > >> > Even screenshots pasted into Word would do. > > >> > That would be service 'above and beyond the call of duty' and > > >> enough > > >> > for anyone contemplating fdata use and AAII in particular. > > >> > > > >> > From there interested users should move to their own trial via > > > the > > >> > money back guarentee. > > >> > > > >> > I have posted a text file there that I am using to keep track of > > >> all > > >> > fdata providers of any kind. > > >> > > > >> > Regards, > > >> > > > >> > BrianB2. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > --- In [email protected], "Joe Landry" <jelandry@> wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > Brian - A few notes back someone mentioned that SI Pro had a > > >> > feature to > > >> > > export data. I fired up the dated > > >> > > version I have and found that the data is organized in 22 > > >> > tables/files that > > >> > > can be exported one at a time. Also there > > >> > > are keys that get exported with each file. If any interest I > > >> can > > >> > store 2 or > > >> > > 3 of these keys in the files section > > >> > > of the fundamental forum for folks to consider, if you'll clue > > >> me > > >> > into the > > >> > > link to that forum. > > >> > > > > >> > > The Standard Table export consists of 6.8 MB in XLS format. > > >> > > There are 7968 issues back in 2004 > > >> > > Formats available are XLS, Lotus, XBase(dbf), fixed length, > > >> > comma > > >> > > separated, or tab separated fields. > > >> > > > > >> > > I'm still working on it but what I see are 2 dimensional > > >> tables, > > >> > ticker > > >> > > rows by column data, as a sample > > >> > > of the Growth Rates keys table below shows. Looks like the > > >> > historical > > >> > > aspect is relative coarse grained > > >> > > going back 8 years on some fields, but that's expected since > > > the > > >> > statistics > > >> > > are reported quarterly. > > >> > > A stumper is how would you get a historical institutional > > >> > ownership unless > > >> > > you had collected the monthly CDs over > > >> > > 8 years. I could be off the mark here, and if so would > > >> appreciate > > >> > someone > > >> > > setting me straight. > > >> > > > > >> > > Probably more than you'd want to know. Looks to be a lot of > > >> work > > >> > to > > >> > > interface to SQL server, even with > > >> > > the SQL Server's data transformation tool. > > >> > > > > >> > > Best regards > > >> > > JOE > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > short_name long_name > > >> > > COMPANY Company name > > >> > > TICKER Ticker > > >> > > EXCHG_DESC Exchange > > >> > > SMG_DESC Sector > > >> > > IMG_DESC Industry > > >> > > CFPS_G1T Cash Flow-Growth 12m > > >> > > SALES_G1T Sales-Growth 12m > > >> > > SALES_G1F Sales-Growth 1yr > > >> > > SALES_G3F Sales-Growth 3yr > > >> > > SALES_G5F Sales-Growth 5yr > > >> > > SALES_G7F Sales-Growth 7yr > > >> > > RSALES_G1T % Rank-Sales-Growth 12m > > >> > > RSALES_G1F % Rank-Sales-Growth 1yr > > >> > > RSALES_G3F % Rank-Sales-Growth 3yr > > >> > > RSALES_G5F % Rank-Sales-Growth 5yr > > >> > > RSALES_G7F % Rank-Sales-Growth 7yr > > >> > > SALES_G1Q5 Sales-Growth from Q5 to Q1 > > >> > > SALES_G2Q6 Sales-Growth from Q6 to Q2 > > >> > > SALES_G3Q7 Sales-Growth from Q7 to Q3 > > >> > > SALES_G4Q8 Sales-Growth from Q8 to Q4 > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > ----- Original Message ----- > > >> > > From: "brian.z123" <brian.z123@> > > >> > > To: <[email protected]> > > >> > > Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2006 9:18 PM > > >> > > Subject: [amibroker] Re: Historical Fundamental Data > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hello treliff, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Agreed that all historical fundamental data is not created > > >> equal. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I am looking out for peoples favourites or recommended sites. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > It is a fair question to ask of the sites that have > > >> screen>export > > >> > > > software if indeed all fields can be exported in one file and > > >> if > > >> > so > > >> > > > what is the depth (years)? > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Re your comment 'the habit of kicking out the previous value > > >> and > > >> > > > simply replacing it with the new one seems to be the norm in > > >> > > > fundaland'. > > >> > > > Do you mean that many of the historical sites I have listed > > >> are > > >> > in > > >> > > > fact only current data providers? > > >> > > > I am trying to understand what you pointed out to us there. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Minor comments. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I have QP and IQ data as two providers who bundle current > > >> fdata > > >> > with > > >> > > > their price data. > > >> > > > There are probably others. > > >> > > > It used to be a very short list but new players pop up every > > >> day. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > http://www.qp2.com > > >> > > > http://www.iqfeed.net/ > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I had Stockwiz in the short list for hist fdata but the site > > >> has > > >> > > > changed recently and I couldn't find any reference to it that > > >> the > > >> > > > public can access. > > >> > > > They do talk about fundas but no details are given and the > > >> link > > >> > to > > >> > > > the data site is know a log on restricted access site. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I added tbsp to the histo list. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > http://www.tbsp.com/public/default.htm > > >> > > > > > >> > > > AAII Stock Investor Pro lists the financials that are > > >> available > > >> > for > > >> > > > 7yrs/8qtrs and has a 'money back period'. > > >> > > > Admittedly 'money backs' are not as user frienly as free demo > > >> > > > versions. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > http://www.aaii.com/stockinvestor/intro/guarantee.cfm > > >> > > > > > >> > http://www.aaii.com/stockinvestor/intro/overview/statementcomp.cfm > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Brian. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > --- In [email protected], "treliff" <treliff@> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks to everyone sharing their insights on fundamental data > > >> > > >> collection. A small contribution: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Those interested only in: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Shares out > > >> > > >> Float > > >> > > >> Short interest > > >> > > >> Insider ownership > > >> > > >> Institutional ownership > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> may consider shortsqueeze.com. At $28 they allow access to > > >> their > > >> > > >> historical data (starting only mid 2004) in XL format. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> ... and a small request: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> In joining the search for historical funda's I found AAII > > > most > > >> > > > likely > > >> > > >> to indeed have this ability by their Data Exporting feature: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> " All of the fields found in Stock Investor Pro can be > > >> exported > > >> > in > > >> > > > a > > >> > > >> variety of formats, including Excel & Lotus spreadsheets, > > >> ASCII > > >> > > > tab- > > >> > > >> and comma-delimited formats, and dBase format. " > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> But does this indeed include ALL historicals? Daily, weekly, > > >> > > > monthly, > > >> > > >> at whichever frequency each field was updated in the past? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> I'm very suspicious and they don't have a trial. Suspicious > > >> > > > because > > >> > > >> the habit of kicking out the previous value and simply > > >> replacing > > >> > > > it > > >> > > >> with the new one seems to be the norm in fundaland (QP, tbsp, > > >> > > > zacks, > > >> > > >> reuters, stockwiz etc etc... and I'm afraid many of the sites > > >> > > > Brian > > >> > > >> has listed). > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> So can anyone confirm (Mike perhaps, who has a > > > subscription), > > >> > for > > >> > > >> example re. short interest (or any other fundamental field): > > >> > will > > >> > > > an > > >> > > >> AAII subscription truly enable me to pour all past data into > > >> > > > a .csv > > >> > > >> file? No PowerTools or SuperScreens, just good'ol plain raw > > >> > data :) > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Stock XYZ short interest: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Jan '05: ... > > >> > > >> Feb '05: ... > > >> > > >> . > > >> > > >> . > > >> > > >> Jun '06: ... > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks for your advice! > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -treliff > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> --- In [email protected], "brian.z123" <brian.z123@> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Now you see it, now you don't. > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Here it is! > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > http://betterinvesting.stores.yahoo.net/23303.html > > >> > > >> > http://nt3.zacks.com/default.htm > > >> > > >> > http://online.barrons.com/public/main > > >> > > >> > http://sec.freeedgar.com/ > > >> > > >> > http://today.reuters.com/news/home.aspx > > >> > > >> > http://www.aaii.com/stockinvestor/intro/ > > >> > > >> > > > > http://www.angelfire.com/in/vestinukgrowthshares/cdrefs.html > > >> > > >> > http://www.aspecthuntley.com.au/af/home?xtm- > > >> > > > licensee=aspecthuntley > > >> > > >> > http://www.capitaliq.com/ > > >> > > >> > http://www.cbs.curtin.edu.au/index.cfm? objectId=1B3273A3- > > >> 0C32- > > >> > > > 2E2E- > > >> > > >> > 4B5B799689FF74FC > > >> > > >> > http://www.crsp.chicagogsb.edu/ > > >> > > >> > http://www.csidata.com/ > > >> > > >> > http://www.exchange- data.com/products/fundamental_data.aspx > > >> > > >> > http://www.fisonline.com/ > > >> > > >> > http://www.fordequity.com/html/pr_data_usdaily.htm > > >> > > >> > http://www.globalfinancialdata.com/index.php3 > > >> > > >> > http://www.hemscottdata.com/ > > >> > > >> > http://www.investmenteasy.com/home.aspx > > >> > > >> > http://www.it is a capital mistake to theorize in advance > > >> of > > >> > the > > >> > > >> > facts.Sherlock Holmes > > >> > > >> > http://www.market-eye.co.uk/ > > >> > > >> > http://www.marketdata.sungard.com/ > > >> > > >> > http://www.msodata.com/ > > >> > > >> > http://www.perfectinfo.com/product_detail.asp? productid=4 > > >> > > >> > http://www.qaisoftware.com/index.html > > >> > > >> > http://www.rimes.com/index.xmp > > >> > > >> > http://www.securities.com/ > > >> > > >> > http://www.thomson.com/index.jsp > > >> > > >> > http://www.trackdata.com/ > > >> > > >> > http://www.tradetools.com/web/scripts/default.asp > > >> > > >> > http://www.valueline.com/ > > >> > > >> > http://www.wvb.com/ > > >> > > >> > http://www.zacks.com/ > > >> > > >> > http://www2.standardandpoors.com/servlet/Satellite? > > >> > > >> > pagename=sp/Page/HomePg&r=1&l=EN&b=10 > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Some offer full financials, some are summarised (financial > > >> or > > >> > > > key > > >> > > >> > statistics/ratios) and the third possiblity also applies. > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Brian. > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > --- In [email protected], "brian.z123" > > > <brian.z123@> > > >> > > >> > wrote: > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > Historical fundamental data providers. > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > Here is a list of links to sites that provide historical > > >> > fdata > > >> > > >> > that > > >> > > >> > > may be of interest to AB users when the SQL plug-in is > > >> > > > released. > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > Some of them were reviewed by forum members at the 'New > > >> > > >> > Fundamental > > >> > > >> > > Data' and 'Institutional Ownership' topics. > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > Most are USA market biased with some global providers > > > and > > >> a > > >> > > >> couple > > >> > > >> > > for specific markets (UK and Aus - sorry I don't have > > > any > > >> > for > > >> > > >> > other > > >> > > >> > > individual markets). > > >> > > >> > > They include retail investor providers, investment club > > >> > > >> providers, > > >> > > >> > > academic providers (free to accredited people???) and > > >> > > >> > institutional > > >> > > >> > > level data (some institutional providers package parts of > > >> > > > their > > >> > > >> > > systems for individual users). > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > The links don't necessarily lead straight to the data; > > >> some > > >> > > >> > snooping > > >> > > >> > > around is required in some cases. > > >> > > >> > > It might also contain errors or dead leads. > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > It is not a complete list by any means but includes most > > >> of > > >> > > > the > > >> > > >> > main > > >> > > >> > > suspects. > > >> > > >> > > Any further leads would be welcomed, including non- > > > English > > >> > > >> > speaking > > >> > > >> > > sites/markets (as long as the post is in English). > > >> > > >> > > The criteria for the list is that the database must > > >> include > > >> > > > some > > >> > > >> > > industry standard fundamental data and be exportable in a > > >> > > > format > > >> > > >> > > that can be used by AB or other similar programs (for > > >> those > > >> > > > who > > >> > > >> > own > > >> > > >> > > more than one software package). > > >> > > >> > > For anyone who has info readily available; providers home > > >> > > >> country, > > >> > > >> > > site URL, market, cost, instruments covered, database > > >> > length, > > >> > > > EOD > > >> > > >> > or > > >> > > >> > > weekly data etc, download/update method and frequency, > > >> data > > >> > > >> > fields, > > >> > > >> > > CD available, download or intermediatry software needed > > >> and > > >> > > >> > download > > >> > > >> > > formats available is the type of stuff that provides > > >> useful > > >> > > >> > guidance > > >> > > >> > > for forum members. > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > I might make a comparison table, and file it at this > > >> site, > > >> > at > > >> > > > a > > >> > > >> > > later date. > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > Brian. > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Please note that this group is for discussion between users > > >> only. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly > > > to > > >> > > > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com > > >> > > > > > >> > > > For other support material please check also: > > >> > > > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please note that this group is for discussion between users only. > > > > > > To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to > > > SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com > > > > > > For other support material please check also: > > > http://www.amibroker.com/support.html > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Yahoo! Groups gets a make over. See the new email design. http://us.click.yahoo.com/XISQkA/lOaOAA/yQLSAA/GHeqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Please note that this group is for discussion between users only. To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com For other support material please check also: http://www.amibroker.com/support.html Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
