|
Tomasz:
Thanks for your clarification.
I have successfully simulated "using redundant
signals for entries" by using low level rotational mode. I am able to
duplicate the results of my WL system, though it is 10-20 times slower than
normal backtesting since I need to use a big WorstRankHeld number to avoid
losing exit signals . I am still looking forward to the new switch to disable
"removing redundant signals" for portfolio backtesting to speed things up. Under
current simulation speed, it is impossible to do any optimization.
A question regarding HandleStops().
I have a n-bar stop in my system. If I use
HandleStops(bar), it delays one more day before exit compared to high level
backtest results.
If I use HandleStops(bar-1), I can get the same
exit dates as high level backtest.
For example,
SetTradeDelays( 1, 1, 1, 1 );
ApplyStop(stopTypeNBar, stopModeBars, 5
);
High level backtest: Entry: 4/18/2006 N-Bar
Exit: 4/25/2006
Use HandleStops(bar): Entry:
4/18/2006 N-Bar Exit: 4/26/2006
Use HandleStops(bar-1): Entry: 4/18/2006 N-Bar
Exit: 4/25/2006
Can you explain how HandleStops() works? What's the
different between HandleStops(bar) and HandleStops(bar-1)?
Thanks,
- Mark
__._,_.___ Please note that this group is for discussion between users only. To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com For other support material please check also: http://www.amibroker.com/support.html
SPONSORED LINKS
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
__,_._,___ |
