Fred,
I think you need to read
your own documentation then
<g>
Or at least people should
read what you have written about IO
Mark
PSO ? ... Never heard of it ...
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ps.com,
"Bob Jagow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I heard such rumors also, Fred.
>
> I'm sure that's now behind them, due in large part to their very
recent
> introduction of a technique called Particle Swarm Optimization.
>
> Bob
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ps.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ps.com]On
> Behalf Of Fred
> Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 8:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ps.com
> Subject: [amibroker] Re: Info on forthcoming book -- Quantitative
> Trading Systems
>
>
> BioComp has done a marvelous job over the years of changing the
> reporting of their results retrospectively ...
>
> --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED]ps.com,
"Bob Jagow" <bjagow@> wrote:
> >
> > Howard,
> > I'd noted your intended use of Dakota and downloaded some info in
> order to
> > compare it to R.
> >
> > I was rather surprised to see via today's refs to Trader Tips,
> >
>
http://www.traders.com/Documentation/FEEDbk_docs/Archive/082006/Trader
> sTips/
> > TradersTips.html
> >
> > that a new TA player, Biocomp Dakota =>
> > http://www.biocompsystems.com/products/Dakota/
> >
> > sells "their" version at up to $1995 even though Sandia's
just-
> released
> > Version 4.0 is still GNU.
> >
> > Were you planning to use some commercial version instead of the
GNU
> release.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bob
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ps.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]ps.com]
On
> > Behalf Of Howard Bandy
> > Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 6:51 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]ps.com
> > Subject: [amibroker] Info on forthcoming book -- Quantitative
> Trading
> > Systems
> >
> >
> > Greetings --
> >
> > The revised Table of Contents and the first sample chapter, Issue
> > Selection, of the book I am writing about quantitative trading
> systems
> > has been posted.
> >
> > www.quantitativetradingsystems.com
> >
> > Constructive comments will be appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Howard
___