Will do! Thanks, Ed. Dan
--- In [email protected], "Ed Hoopes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dan, > > Try a weighted average of 2 LinearRegression's like: > > Composite = 2*LR(10) + 1*LR(20) / 3 > > Put in lengths&weights appropriate for your time frame. Backtesting > this will of course drive you crazy ! :) > > Ed > > --- In [email protected], "d_hanegan" <dhanegan@> wrote: > > > > Thanks, Ed. I was hoping to find something that was not quite as > > jumpy as a linear regression line. I had typed Closing prices into > > Excel and charted Poly Lines and it looks like it has SOME promise. > > I also checked out the threads on Sigma Bands and they too SEEM to > > have some viability. I am not sure how helpful it would truly be to > > have either. I'm just after the cat and looking for other ways to > > skin it. Thanks again for your input. > > > > Dan > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Ed Hoopes" <reefbreak_sd@> > > wrote: > > > > > > I have written a least squares fit to a quadratic equation. It was > > > quite difficult due to the computation of the coefficient of the > > x^2 > > > term. The problem is that AB uses single precision math, and the > > > computation would 'blow up' every so often because the coeff of > > x^2 is > > > the difference between two very large numbers. > > > > > > I used the technique of Gaussian Elimination and had to create a > > > separate time base to prevent the 'blow up's. > > > > > > Then, if you want to do backtesting, it is necessary to extract > > arrays > > > of price data n-days back, then align and load them in with the > > > artificial time base array before you start the Gauss. It is really > > > quite messy, but I was able to make it work eventually. > > > > > > So of course the REAL question is if it works better than - say - a > > > linear regression which Tomasz has kindly pre-programmed for us. > > > Being slightly 'bendy' because it is a section of a parabola, > > entries > > > occur a bar or two earlier, and exits are similarly. Whipsaws are > > > also a little increase because of the flexability. In all, it > > works > > > better than a linear regression, but not a lot better. > > > > > > The code is not available - as it is used commercially. > > > > > > ReefBreak > > > > > > --- In [email protected], "d_hanegan" <dhanegan@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello All: > > > > > > > > Sigma Bands aside, has anyone seen or done any work on nth order > > > > Polynomial Trendlines? > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > Dan > > > > > > > > > > Please note that this group is for discussion between users only. To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com For other support material please check also: http://www.amibroker.com/support.html Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
