Again ... I don't find what you say to be particularly startling in and of itself as it embodies discretionaty systems in general ... Not my cup of tea but that doesn't make them any less viable ... What I find odd is your statement coupled with a quote from a document written about Woodies methods that was apparently okayed by Woodie.
--- In [email protected], "Gerard Carey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Quite > G > > The inference - irrespective of who says what Woodie's is not a system > that can be executed mechanically but a method that requires human > input. > > R > Please note that this group is for discussion between users only. To get support from AmiBroker please send an e-mail directly to SUPPORT {at} amibroker.com For NEW RELEASE ANNOUNCEMENTS and other news always check DEVLOG: http://www.amibroker.com/devlog/ For other support material please check also: http://www.amibroker.com/support.html Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/amibroker/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
