... And maybe just not posting OT stuff would be an improvement ... Enough ... since this is now Off Off Topic ... Let's move on ...
--- In [email protected], Yuki Taga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Fred, > > Of course I don't think TJ should be reviewing every message, and I > don't think I even hinted at that. > > But this used to be more like a *community* years ago. With actual > *dialog*. Not all of that has been lost, but there sure is a lot > more roughness to the tone these days. > > Even TJ has not been immune. He *roasts* people (who, admittedly, > post questions they could easily find answers for in a readme) that > he would have been quite a bit more gentle with a few years ago. The > perils of a successful small-business model, I imagine. I don't know > how he does it all, and I know I could not. > > Anyway, maybe just posting a reply with a subject that includes OT, > and a "maybe this has drifted OT" might have been better than the > rhetorical, and clearly sarcastic sounding, even if it wasn't meant > to be, "What does that or THIS have to do with AB?" > > Sorry I suggested you are a list bully. Maybe you just get up on the > wrong side of the bed some days. ^_^ > > Yuki > > Friday, December 8, 2006, 9:47:09 AM, you wrote: > > F> To the best of my knowledge there is no monitor here outside of TJ > F> any more ... If you think his time is better spent reviewing every > F> post to see which ones are related to AB as opposed to which ones > F> aren't then so be it ... I only try to point folks who seem to go on > F> and on with threads that have nothing to do with AB somewhere > F> else ... Even AB-TS would be a better choice as this is the place > F> newbies as well as other come to gain understanding about the > F> features and functions of AB ... not whether or not they should be > F> considering some form of TA, FA or DA ... > > F> --- In [email protected], Yuki Taga <yukitaga@> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Fred, > >> > >> The point is well known. And *this* overzealousness is *precisely* > >> why Dimitris left this list. > >> > >> Yes, OT, and blah, blah, blah. But look at the post that started > F> the > >> mini-war here, Fred. (at least it led to defense, counterpoint, and > >> *more* messages, not fewer) It was *yours*. Why did this happen? > >> > >> I thought this was a moderated list, so I thought it didn't need > >> attempts at moderation from anyone other than the moderator. And I > >> thought someone other than you was the moderator. > >> > >> So, in addition to the question you posed, I'd pose one myself. > >> > >> Why would you even bother to take the time to compose the message > F> you > >> did, with the tag comment? It was a small detour, and some people > >> like to read. And marked "OT", it's absolutely street legal. > >> > >> That ("please mark this OT", which you could have done without any > >> sarcasm or additional comment at all) should have been your *only* > >> action regarding the subject matter, IMHO. > >> > >> You do a hell of a lot of nice things for this forum and Amibroker, > >> Fred. But you can be a genuine list bully sometimes, too, for no > >> good reason that I can see. > >> > >> Yuki > >> > >> Friday, December 8, 2006, 6:05:52 AM, you wrote: > >> > >> F> Non AB related "pearls" are to be found elsewhere ... > F> Nonsensical or > >> F> otherwise, politcal commentary too ... > >> > >> F> --- In [email protected], "brpnw1" <tradermail@> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> You guys remind me of the Bush Administration in so many ways. > >> >> > >> >> ~B > >> >> > >> >> --- In [email protected], "sebastiandanconia" > >> >> <sebastiandanconia@> wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> > I used to cast pearls before swine, too, until I discovered > F> that > >> >> some of > >> >> > the swine had better pearls than I did.:) A word to the wise: > >> >> > Over-confidence is a leading indicator of significant > F> drawdowns. > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > S. > >> >> > > >> >> > --- In [email protected], "brpnw1" <tradermail@> wrote: > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Obviously I am throwing pearls before swine again. Sorry I > >> >> misread > >> >> > > you. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > ~B > >> >> > > > >> >> > > --- In [email protected], "Fred" ftonetti@ wrote: > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Presactly ... I tried to make a joke out of it but I think > F> it > >> >> was > >> >> > > > taken as a typo ... > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > --- In [email protected], "sebastiandanconia" > >> >> > > > <sebastiandanconia@> wrote: > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > I think what Fred meant was that this is a forum for the > >> >> > > practical > >> >> > > > > application of AB and not for the discussion of trading > >> >> > > philosophy, > >> >> > > > > except as it pertains to demonstrating what AB can do. > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Luck, > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Sebastian > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > --- In [email protected], "brpnw1" <tradermail@> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > What does good TA have to do with AB? Do you really > F> want > >> F> to > >> >> > > ask > >> >> > > > that > >> >> > > > > > question? > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > ~Bman > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > --- In [email protected], "Fred" ftonetti@ > F> wrote: > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > I agree ... Good T & A is one of my favorite > >> >> > > methodologies ... > >> >> > > > but > >> >> > > > > > > what does that or THIS have to do with AB ? > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Best, > >> > >> Yuki > >> > > > > > Best, > > Yuki >
