How about the other Jurik Tools. Are there clones for them as well. carlacash26 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I wonder how that formula compares to the other MA's? Anyone tested it in comparison to HULL, T3, JMA etc? Is it a good JMA clone?
Would appreciate any results of such a comparison! /Carlacash --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "brpnw1" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Someone posted this about 3 or 4 years ago, here. I believe the > original post may have been deleted. I have never used the real JMA, > so I have nothing to compare it to, but it does work and is a bit > tighter than Tillson's T3. So here it is again -- > > function JMA( array, per ) > { > TN1=MA(array,per); > s1=0; > for( i = 0; i < per; i=i+1 ) > { > s1=s1+((per-(2*i)-1)/2)*Ref(array,-i); > } > return TN1+(((per/2)+1)*S1)/((per+1)*per); > } > k=Param("Period",15,1,100,1); > J=JMA(C,k); > > ~B > > --- In amibroker@yahoogroups.com, "carlacash26" <carlacash26@> > wrote: > > > > Hi, I'm lookng for a JMA clone for Amibroker. > > > > I have gotten a clone but it is written in .NET so I don't know > how to > > implement it in AFL. > > > --------------------------------- Have a burning question? Go to Yahoo! Answers and get answers from real people who know.