You will never get a true result with C < LLV(L,30) as the close is always
greater or equal than the low
conversely C>LLV(L,30) will always be true
This is because LLV(L,30) includes todays bar and if today is lowest low
close will be >=it
C>Ref(LLV(L,30),-1) will give if todays close is > than the previous bars
LLV
If you want to check that a bar close is never lower than previous LLV you
can simply use a sum finction or Barssince function
Here are some examples to get you started
Sum(C>Ref(LLV(L,30),-1),30)==30
Sum(C<Ref(LLV(L,30),-1),30)==0
BarsSince(C<Ref(LLV(L,30),-1))>=30
You will just need to ensure the bar numbers are checking the correct number
of history bars
--
Cheers
Graham
AB-Write >< Professional AFL Writing Service
Yes, I write AFL code to your requirements
http://www.aflwriting.com
On 17/12/06, Sidney Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
*Close* > LLV(*Low*, 30) tells me if todays close is greater than the
lowest low in the last 30 days.
What I need is to test if the close *remains* greater than the previous 30
day low.
I am not certain, but I take this to mean the close should not go below
the previous 30 day low
at any time during the 30 day period. Would this require a loop to
evaluate it properly?
Implementation ideas?
Cheers, Sid
